This document presents a grand theory of national identity proposed by Eric Kaufmann. The theory uses an "optical metaphor" to visualize how individuals view nationhood through different "lenses" such as ideologies, social locations, interests, and psychological predispositions. These lenses shape how individuals interpret various "resources" that define nations, such as history, culture, institutions, and values. The theory aims to clarify major issues in nationalism studies and serve as a heuristic device rather than a positive theory. It draws upon previous work analyzing the relationship between individual and collective identity and debates around ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood.
This document presents a grand theory of national identity proposed by Eric Kaufmann. The theory uses an "optical metaphor" to visualize how individuals view nationhood through different "lenses" such as ideologies, social locations, interests, and psychological predispositions. These lenses shape how individuals interpret various "resources" that define nations, such as history, culture, institutions, and values. The theory aims to clarify major issues in nationalism studies and serve as a heuristic device rather than a positive theory. It draws upon previous work analyzing the relationship between individual and collective identity and debates around ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document presents a grand theory of national identity proposed by Eric Kaufmann. The theory uses an "optical metaphor" to visualize how individuals view nationhood through different "lenses" such as ideologies, social locations, interests, and psychological predispositions. These lenses shape how individuals interpret various "resources" that define nations, such as history, culture, institutions, and values. The theory aims to clarify major issues in nationalism studies and serve as a heuristic device rather than a positive theory. It draws upon previous work analyzing the relationship between individual and collective identity and debates around ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
University of London A Grand Theory • Parsons' 'filing cabinet' • Agnostic re source of changes • About effects rather than causes • Heuristic Device rather than positive theory • Builds upon work of Zimmer (2003); Hutchinson (2005); Confino and others Helps Clarify Major Issues • Ideology and national identity • 'Ethnic-Civic' Nations • 'Nations before Nationalism' • Universalism (Islam, Neoconservatism) as nationalism? • 'Nations as Zones of Conflict' (Hutchinson 2005) • Local vs National • Relationship between individual identity and collective identity (ie. 'consumption v production') • Ethnosymbolism: continuity of nations or revival of resources? Optical Metaphor • Referent: Frame of Reference for the Individual (Territory, Population). Can change for subjective and geopolitical reasons • Lenses: Ideologies, Location (Social, Geographic), Interests, Psychological predispositions • Resources: Landscape, History, Genealogy, Institutions, Values, Culture, Economy (Zimmer 2003) • Ideology and Nationalism • Ethnic-Civic • Ideology and the Nation • 'Nations before Nationalism' • Universalism (Islam, Neoconservatism) as nationalism? Values Lens: British Unionist Ideology Lens: Multicultural Ideology • Note that collective representations of the nation are also ideologies, albeit particularist • Must distinguish Ireland as referent from collective ideology of Irish national identity produced by intellectuals/elites, and this is then different from an individual's image of their Irish national identity • Can have individuals identifying with Ireland before the ideology of Irish national identity has crystallized • People may see Ireland through prism of other ideologies (i.e. Catholic, Unionist) • Social Location: 'Nations as Zones of Conflict' (Hutchinson 2005) • Geographic Location: Local vs National Aristocratic-Upper Class Social Location Whig-Middle Class Social Location • Interests and the construction of national identity • Psychology and individual's national identity • Relationship between individual identity and collective Identity • Ethnosymbolism: continuity of nations or revival of resources? • Can locate the underpinnings of any theory • As well as elements which do not easily fit within established theories (i.e. ideology, social location) Read All About It…….. • 'The Lenses of Nationhood: An Optical Model of Identity', Nations and Nationalism, forthcoming • "Dominant Ethnicity and Dominant Nationhood: Empirical and Normative Aspects" in Lecours, A. and G. Nootens (eds.), Dominant Nationalism, Dominant Ethnicity: Ident ity, Federalism and Democracy (Berlin: Peter Lang, forthcoming) • http://www.sneps.net/NNE/n&e.htm