This document defines and explains the key aspects of a contract of indemnity under Indian law. It notes that a contract of indemnity involves two parties - the indemnifier who promises to compensate losses, and the indemnity holder whose losses are covered. The indemnifier is responsible for reimbursing the indemnity holder for any damages, legal costs, or amounts paid in compromise relating to the matter covered by the indemnity. The rights of each party are discussed, and a key case related to indemnity is summarized.
This document defines and explains the key aspects of a contract of indemnity under Indian law. It notes that a contract of indemnity involves two parties - the indemnifier who promises to compensate losses, and the indemnity holder whose losses are covered. The indemnifier is responsible for reimbursing the indemnity holder for any damages, legal costs, or amounts paid in compromise relating to the matter covered by the indemnity. The rights of each party are discussed, and a key case related to indemnity is summarized.
This document defines and explains the key aspects of a contract of indemnity under Indian law. It notes that a contract of indemnity involves two parties - the indemnifier who promises to compensate losses, and the indemnity holder whose losses are covered. The indemnifier is responsible for reimbursing the indemnity holder for any damages, legal costs, or amounts paid in compromise relating to the matter covered by the indemnity. The rights of each party are discussed, and a key case related to indemnity is summarized.
CHIRAYU OLKAR 42 AMBIKA PARMAR 44 NIMESH PARMAR 45 VIKAR PATEL - 51 WHAT IS MEANT BY INDEMNITY IN A CONTRACT?
a contract by which one party promises to save the
other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself, or by the conduct of any other person, is called a contract of indemnity".
PARTIES TO CONTRACT OF INDEMNITY:
INDEMNIFIER: The person who promises to indemnify. INDEMNITY HOLDER: The person whose loss is to be indemnified. KEY FUNDAMENTALS 1. It is a promise to compensate for or security against damage, loss or injury. 2. In wider sense it includes all contracts of insurance, guarantee. It is not a collateral but an independent contract. 3. It is a tool for allocating risks contingent liability.
4. Indemnity clauses, amongst other things, must be
clear, specific, where possible stipulate the circumstances under which the indemnity will arise, be considered in light of any exclusion of liability clauses found elsewhere in the agreement and state what damages will be payable in the event of the clause being successfully invoked ENFORCEMENT 1. A contract of indemnity can be enforced according to its terms. 2. Claim of Indemnity holder can include: damages, legal costs of adjudication, amount paid under the terms of compromise 3. The measure of damages is the extent to which the promise has been indemnified. 4. Indemnifier should ideally be informed of the legal proceedings or should be joined as third party 5. There is no onus to show breach or actual loss. RIGHTS OF INDEMNITY HOLDER
a) All the damages that he may have been
compelled to pay in any suit in respect of any matter to which the promise of the indemnifier applies.
For example, if A contracts to indemnify B against
the consequences of any proceedings which C may take against B in respect of a particular transaction. If C does institute legal proceeding against B in that matter and B pays damages to C, A will be liable to make good all the damages B had to pay in the case. b) all the costs of suits that he may have had to pay to the third party provided he acted as a man of ordinary prudence and he did not act in contravention of the directions of the indemnifier or if he had acted under the authority of the indemnifier to contest such a suit.
For example, car rental companies stipulate that the
person hiring will be responsible for damage to the rental car caused by his reckless driving and will have to indemnify the rental company. c) All the sums that he may have paid under the terms of any compromise of any such suit provided such compromise is not contrary to the indemnifiers orders and was a prudent one or if he acted under authority of the indemnifier to compromise the suit.
The indemnity holder is also entitled to losses
due to change of law not foreseen by the parties when they entered into such contract of indemnity RIGHTS OF THE INDEMNIFIER The rights of the indemnifier have not been mentioned expressly anywhere in the Act. KEP POINTS NUMBER OF PARTIES INVOLVED - There are two parties to the contract viz. indemnifier (promisor) and the Indemnified (promise).
OBJECTIVE OF PURPOSE Reimbursement of loses
NUMBER OF CONTRACTS There is only one contract
in case of a contract of indemnity, i.e., between the indemnifier and the indemnified.
NATURE OF LIABILITY Liability of the indemnifier to
the indemnified is primary and independent ,so its primary
LIABITY IS DUE - The liability of the indemnifier arises
only on the happening of a contingency. EXISTING DEBT OR DUTY No existing Debt or duty
REQUEST BY THE DEBTOR Independent
RIGHT TO SUE An indemnifier cannot sue a
third party for loss in his own name, because there is no privity of contract. He can do so only if there is an assignment in his favour. GAJAN MORESHWAR VS. MORESHWAR MADAN 1942 BOM 302, FACTS: G Moreshwar got a plot in Bombay for a long lease period. He transferred the lease to M Madan for a limited period. M Madan started construction over the said plot and got his supplies from a K D Mohan Das. When Mohandas asked for payment, the defendant could not pay up. Upon request of M Madan, G Moreshwar executed a mortgagee deed in favor of K D Mohan Das. Mohandas, the supplier. Interest rate was decided and G Moreshwar put a charge over his properties. A date was set for the return of the principal amount. M Madan had agreed to pay the principal amount, the interest and to get the mortgage deed released before a certain date. M Madan did not pay anything to K D Mohan Das; it was G Moreshwar who paid some interest. When despite repeated request, M Madan did not pay the principal amount, interest or get the mortgage deed released, G Moreshwar sued him for indemnity. HELD: The Privy Council did not accept M Madans stance that G Moreshwar had suffered no loss and thus could not claim anything under Sections 124 and 125. The Council held that an indemnity holder has rights other than those mentioned in the Sections above. If the indemnity holder has incurred a liability and the liability is absolute, he can turn to the indemnifier to take care of the liability and pay it off. Thus, G Moreshwar was entitled to be indemnified by M Madan against all liability under the mortgage and deed of charge.