Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the Audit
Engagement
Review for Contingent Liabilities
A contingent liability is defined as an existing
condition, situation, or set of circumstances
involving uncertainty as to possible loss to an entity
that will ultimately be resolved when some future
event occurs or fails to occur.
Examples
Probable: The future event is likely to occur.
• Pending or threatened litigation
Reasonably Possible: The chances of the
• Actual or possible claims and
assessments
future event occurring is more than remote
but less than probable.
• Income tax disputes
• Product warranties or defects Remote: The chance of the future event
• Guarantees of obligations to
occurring is slight.
others
• Agreements to repurchase
receivables that have been sold
2
Audit Procedures for Identifying
Contingent Liabilities
Read minutes of meetings Review contracts, loan
of the board of directors, agreements, leases, and
committees of the board, correspondence from
and stockholders. government agencies.
3
Audit Procedures for Identifying
Contingent Liabilities
Specific Audit Procedures Conducted Near
Completion of Audit
Inquire and discuss with
Examine documents in the entity’s
management about its policies and
records such as correspondence
procedures for identifying,
and invoices from attorneys for
evaluating, and accounting for
pending or threatened lawsuits.
contingent liabilities.
5
LO# 3
6
Example of Legal Letter
To secure the
To obtain a favorable
availability of raw
pricing arrangement
materials
11
Dual Dating
When a subsequent event is recorded or disclosed
in the financial statements after sufficient,
appropriate audit evidence has been obtained
but before the issuance of the financial
statements, the auditor considers the following
options for dating of the auditor’s report:
(1) “Dual date” the report (original date of report
plus date of subsequent event—limits liability)
(2) Change the date of the auditor’s report to the
date of the subsequent event—extends liability
12
Audit Procedures to Look for
Subsequent Events
Examples of audit
Inquire of procedures
Management
Read Interim
Financial
Read Minutes Statements
of Meetings Examine the
Books of
Inquire of Original Entry
Legal Counsel
13
Final Evidential
Evaluation Processes
Perform final analytical Obtain a Review working
procedures. representation letter. papers.
14
Perform Final Analytical
Review Procedures
Analytical Review is required in the final
review stages of the audit.
The procedures will use “final” financial
statement amounts (after adjustments).
Typically performed at a high level (senior
manager or partner)
Auditor considers whether the financial
statement amounts make sense given the
auditor’s knowledge gained during the
audit.
15
Obtain a Letter of
Representations
Commonly called a ‘rep letter’
Puts in writing all significant
representations that management made
to the auditors
Drafted by the auditors, but it is typed on
client’s letterhead and signed by the CEO
and CFO (and perhaps others)
If client refuses to sign a rep letter, it
would constitute a scope limitation
16
Example Rep Letter
17
Example Rep Letter (cont’d)
18
Example Rep Letter (cont’d)
19
Example Rep Letter (cont’d)
20
Working Paper Review
Each working paper should be reviewed by
an audit team member who is senior to
the person preparing the working papers.
For example:
– A senior would review staff working papers
– A manager would review the senior’s working
papers and probably staff working papers, too.
– A partner typically reviews the critical working
papers, and any prepared by the manager.
The partner needs to ensure that the
working papers support the audit opinion.
21
Assessing Final Results:
Estimating Likely Misstatements
22
Independent Engagement
Quality Review
Most firms require an engagement quality
review for publicly traded companies and
for privately held companies whose
financial statements will be widely
circulated.
Performed by a partner who has not
otherwise participated on the engagement
Will review/scrutinize significant findings
and critical judgments
23
Archiving and Retention
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and PCAOB’s Documentation Standard:
• Require audit firms to archive their public-company audit files for
retention within 45 days following the time the auditor grants permission
to use the auditor’s report in connection with the issuance of the
company’s financial statements.
• Require audit firms to retain audit documentation for 7 years from the
date of completion of the engagement, as indicated by the date of the
auditor’s report, unless a longer period of time is required by law.
• Require audit firms to retain all documents that “form the basis of the
audit or review.”
• Require audit firms to include in the audit file for significant matters any
document created, sent, or received, including documents that are
inconsistent with a final conclusion. Significant changes in audit plans or
conclusions must also be documented.
24
Evaluation of Going Concern
What is a going concern?
When going concern is an issue, consider
management’s plans to address the issue
(e.g. sell stock, dispose of assets, etc.)
Auditor considers the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern for one year
from the balance sheet date
Factors that may be considered when
evaluating going concern
25
Going Concern Considerations
26
Going Concern Considerations
27
Evaluation of Going Concern
After evaluating evidence and
management’s plans with regard to going
concern, if the auditor believes there is
substantial doubt about the entity’s ability
to continue as a going concern for a
reasonable period of time (one year), the
auditor should:
– Consider the adequacy of disclosure in the
footnotes to the financial statements
– Add an explanatory paragraph to the auditor’s
report
28
Communications with:
“Those Charged with Governance”
Required by the auditing standards
For public companies, “those charged with
governance” would normally be the board
of directors, and the audit committee in
particular.
Intent of this requirement is to promote a
healthy dialog between the auditors and
those charged with governance about the
financial reporting matters.
Will occur at various times during the
audit process 29
Communications with:
“Those Charged with Governance”
30
Subsequent Discovery of Facts Existing at
the Date of the Auditor’s Report
31
Subsequent Discovery of Facts Existing at
the Date of the Auditor’s Report
Auditor’s attorney should probably be
consulted due to the legal liability involved
If financial statements were in error, the
auditor should request that the client issue
an immediate revision of the financial
statements, if possible.
If immediate revision is not possible, the
client should notify all people believed to
be relying on the statements that they
should stop relying on the financial
statements.
32
Subsequent Discovery of Facts Existing
at the Date of the Auditor’s Report