Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diagnosis of PPROM
Management of PPROM
Preterm Labor and Delivery
Preterm Delivery (<37 weeks)
12.5
12
1996
11.5
1998
11 2000
2002
10.5 2004
2006
10
2008
Year
6
Preterm Birth - US
South Carolina, 2007 Average
Premature Rupture
of the Membranes Preterm
35% Birth
Medical
Intervention While this suggests distinct pathways, many
25% of the risk factors for all 3 are similar
Goldenberg, RL. The Management of Preterm Labor. Obstet Gynecol 100 (5):1020-36, Nov 2002 )
PPROM
Functions of Membranes and Amniotic Fluid
Membranes
Barrier to infection
Maintenance of amniotic fluid
Storage site for phosphoglycerolipids
Amniotic Fluid
Allows pulmonary development
Provides for full fetal movement and growth
Protects fetus & cord from compression and trauma
Rotschild A, et al Neonatal outcome after prolonged preterm rupture of the membranes Am J Obstet
Gynecol 162:46-52, 1990
10
Membrane Functions
Aquaporins
Growth factors
Oxidation?
Paracrine functions?
Zhu, X, et al The expression of aquaporin 8 and aquaporin 9 in fetal membranes and placenta in term
pregnancies complicated by idiopathic polyhydramnios. Early Hum Dev 2010 Oct;86(10):657-63.
Membrane Structure
Chorion (200 µm)
cytotrophoblasts
basement membrane
El Khwad M, et al Term human fetal membranes have a weak zone over-lying the lower uterine pole
and cervix before the onset of labor Biol Reprod 72:720-726, 2005
14
Mechanism
Ascending infection
Stretch
Necrosis
Decidual adherence
18
Neonatal Sepsis - PPROM
40%
PROM
20%
Intact
0%
<20 28-30 31-33 34-36 >36
Mercer B Preterm premature rupture of the membranes Obstet Gynecol 101:178-193, 2003
19
Natural History of PPROM
Latency increases with early EGA, AFI
Reseal? 3-10 %
Diagnosis
Patient history
Diagnostic tests
US
Performance Metrics:
False positive results are up to 17.4%
False negative results are 12.9%
Sensitivity 90.7%
Specificity 77.2%
Drawbacks:
Performance Metrics:
False positive results are 5-30%
False negative results are 12.9%
Sensitivity 51.4% (no labor)
Specificity 70.8% (no labor)
Drawbacks:
23
Pooling
Technique:
Visualization of an amniotic pool in the posterior fornix
of the vagina
Accuracy:
Subjective
Drawbacks:
Speculum exam. Subjective. Other fluids.
24
Ultrasound
Technique:
Ultrasound can detect oligohydramnios, suggesting loss of
amniotic fluid due to membrane rupture
Accuracy:
Not a reliable screening test if used
alone. Used only to help confirm
diagnosis
Drawbacks:
25
Amnio-dye Infusion
Technique:
Instillation of dilute indigo carmine into the amniotic cavity and
confirmation of rupture of membranes by documenting leakage of dye
into the vagina (staining of tampon)
Accuracy:
“Gold Standard” for diagnosis of rupture
of membranes
Drawbacks:
26
Problems with Traditional Practices
“…fern test is neither sensitive nor specific enough for
diagnostic determination of premature rupture of
membranes. We recommend against routinely providing
fern testing alone for the detection of ruptured
membranes.”
“…pH/nitrazine test is sensitive only when used in
women for whom membrane status is known. …the test
does not appear to be sufficiently sensitive or specific
enough for diagnostic determination of premature rupture
of membranes.”
29
Fetal Fibronectin (fFN)
fFN is found to be associated with dislocation of amniotic sac
relative to cervix and is used today for detecting premature labor.
Lockwood et al., 1994
30
PAMG-1
Immunochromatographic assay
32
PAMG-1 Immunoassay
Step Two: Swab is dipped into the vial of solvent for one minute.
Step Three: Test strip is placed in the vial containing the specimen
extracted from the swab by the solvent.
Step Four: Remove the strip after 5-10 minutes and read the results.
33
PAMG-1 Immunoassay
PAMG-1 Performance
FDA approved use of the test by nurses and
midwives as well as physicians
Clinical multi-site prospective study conducted on
patients 15-42 weeks of gestation
Cousins et al, Am J Perinat, 2005
Primary Study results:
Sensitivity: 99%
Specificity: 100%
PPV: 100%
NPV: 99%
34
Diagnostic Performance
Old PAMG-1
Time/Labor Costs Methods Assay
Estimated Pt. Time in Hospital (hrs) 4 1*
Estimated Personnel Time/Pt. (hrs) - RNs 3 0.25 **
Estimated Personnel Time/Pt. (hrs) - MDs 0.5 0 ***
Avg. Personnel Cost/Pt. - RN (~$34/HR) $102.00 $8.50 ****
Avg. Personnel Cost/Pt. MD (~$147/HR) $73.50 $0.00 ****
Old PAMG-1
Material Costs Methods Assay
pH/Nitrazin (Speculum) $2.33 $0.00 1
Fern (microscope wear/tear, slide) (Speculum) $1.71 $0.00 2
Pooling (Speculum) $1.50 $0.00 3
Ultrasound AFI, use/maintenance (US$300 Assuming 30% probability of use per pt) $90.00 $0.00 4
Indigo Carmine Amnioinfusion (US$600-1200 range, assume .05% use probability) $4.50 $0.00 4
PAMG-1 Assay ROM Test $0.00 $49.95
37
PPROM Management
Clinicians must weigh the risk of prolonging gestation
against the risks of serious maternal-fetal complications
while managing PROM.
38
PPROM Initial Management
Avoid cervical checks
2.1 +/- 4.0 days
11.3 +/- 13.4 days
Lewis DF, Effects of digital examination on latency period for PPROM Obstet
Gynecol 1992;80 630-34
39
PPROM Management
34-36 weeks – Deliver
Chorio – 2 % vs 16 % (p<.001)
Higher pH – 7.35 vs 7.25 (p<.009)
Naef, 1991
Amniocentesis?
Culture positive 25-40 %
Individualize
Steroids?
Risks?
CP reduction? (Neuroprotection)
32-34 weeks?
53
PPROM Management Summary
Antibiotics – Yes
Steroids – Yes (< 32 weeks)
Deliver by 34 weeks
Deliver for FLM, infection, NRFS