Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tasks in Action
Diann Herington, Elizabeth Johnson, Derek Paulsen
Our Students
Diann’s Classes:
A large number of
students are of low-
socioeconomic status.
In my Algebra 1B classes, I
have a large number of
students who are of low
socioeconomic status. My
classes are also very racially
diverse.
Our Students
● African American
● African American/ Biracial
● Other
○ Multi-Racial
○ Alaskan Native
Derek’s Classes: ○
○
Hispanic
American Indian
○ Asian Pacific Islander
Our Students
● African American
● African American/ Biracial
● Other
○ Multi-Racial
○ Alaskan Native
Derek’s Class: ○
○
Hispanic
American Indian
○ Asian Pacific Islander
Period 7 class: 33% male,
67% female
What the Research Says
about Our Students
● “Latino, African American, and low-income students are not as likely to have the same
opportunities to learn in our schools as other groups.” (Flores, p. 30)
● Women, families living in poverty, and people of color have struggled to receive equal
educational opportunities, which is perpetuated by our current system of education
(Appelbaum)
What the Research Says
about Our Students
● In general, students of racial minority and low socioeconomic status experience fewer
opportunities to learn and succeed. Whether it be a lack of access to resources, lower
expectations of ability, or inequitable societal experiences, these students face hurdles
that other students do not.
● Through strong student-teacher relationships and an awareness of these inequities,
teachers have the ability to guide students over those hurdles in the pursuit of learning.
● By implementing a social justice task, teachers are able to learn more about their
students while taking an active role in understanding and impacting inequities in our
society.
Task 1: Fair Wages
In this task, Algebra 1 students are asked to analyze 6
different families from Des Moines to determine whether or
not they can afford the housing that they need. Families in
this task represent a diverse cross-section of society today
with a wide variety of races, ages, sexual orientations, and
socioeconomic statuses.
● This year’s group was much more eager to find data and
investigate things that interested them than the students
from my previous implementation.
Derek’s Implementation Experience
Challenges Successes Ideas for the Future
Attendance/consistency: Applicable: Topic selection:
● Most groups work really well ● Students started to view ● I would be sure to make them
together. Some chose not to statistics in terms of real think about a variety of
work in groups at all. Others world applications. I heard a different social issues. For
had issues with members lot of them say, “I could see instance, giving them
showing up consistently. myself doing this in my job or suggestions about
in the future”. controversial issues like
Class Time used: Multiple Entry Points: black suspects being killed
● Took 2 weeks of class time, ● Incorporating many by cops would be helpful.
plus another 2 days of components allowed certain Class environment:
presentations. students to shine more than ● I also need to do a better job
others. Artistic students at opening up the inquisitive
Teaching technology: designed/created the poster. spirit of discussion and
● Google Sheets was new to The researchers dug deep for challenging the status quo to
many of the students. data. The talkers were able to have them in the right mind
present what the group frame.
found.
Student Work
● Population vs Life Expectancy
● Life Satisfaction in Europe
● Abortion Rates in the World
● Medical Marijuana in Colorado by county
● High School Dropouts Rates
Connections to Research that We
Experienced in our Classrooms
Continuous Revision:
● “We aim to illustrate that teaching is a continual journey; in that, ‘effective’
mathematics teachers do not master teaching, but rather find themselves in
a continuous state of growth and change” (as cited in Stinson et al., 2012, p.
81-82).
Rich Discussions:
● “Teachers and students need to create classrooms where they openly and
honestly discuss justice issues” (Gutstein, 2003, p. 63).
Constraints:
● “In actual teachers’ classrooms, the constraints of time and pressures of
testing often force teachers to prioritize one goal over the other” (Kokka,
2015, p. 16).
Suggestions from the Research
Getting students involved in the task development process:
● Freire argues for “a problem-posing pedagogy that requires learners
and teachers to dialectically co-generate tasks based on themes that
lead learners to raise their critical awareness of those themes in
relation to their disciplinary content learning” (as cited by Larnell et al.,
2016, p. 21).
Increased Differentiation:
● “Social justice must also be taught with authentic empathy in the
classroom. This means diversifying instructional methods to provide
multiple entry points for personal connections with the mathematical
content being presented. These entry points should be student-
centered” (Bond & Chernoff, 2015, p. 28).
Concluding Thoughts
Is creating complex social justice tasks difficult? It
can be. However, the payoff for the
underprivileged sub groups that are being left
behind in our current system as well as for the rest
of the people in the classroom can be monumental.
Opening doors, being catalysts for change, and
engaging students at a very high level should be
the norm of every classroom. Social Justice Tasks
are just one way that teachers can help build a
more inclusive society of learners and problem-
solvers.
“This recognition of disparities is coupled with the position that
teachers can and should be both educators and advocates who are
committed to the democratic ideal and to diminishing existing
inequities in school and society by helping to redistribute educational
opportunities” (Cochran‐Smith et al., 2009, p. 350).
1. Create a task or find one that is already out there to use for one of your classes.
2. Try it out! Remember that students may not be used to discussing these kinds of topics. Continue to
build a classroom culture that is open, understanding, and inquisitive.
3. Adapt your task for future use. Reflect and revise.
4. Develop a different task for a different class. Get your students involved in the planning.
5. Follow this until you feel comfortable creating and running these tasks in class.
6. Try one per Chapter or Unit.
Bibliography
Appelbaum, P., & Davila, E. (2007). Math education and social justice: Gatekeepers,
politics and teacher agency. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 22,
1-23.
Cochran‐Smith, M., Shakman, K., Jong, C., Terrell, D., Barnatt, J., & McQuillan, P.
(2009). Good and Just Teaching: The Case for Social Justice in Teacher
Education. American Journal of Education, 115(3), 347-377. doi:10.1086/597493
Flores, A. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap
or opportunity gap? The High School Journal, 91(1), 29–42.
Stinson, D. W., Bidwell, C. R., & Powell, G. C. (2012). Critical pedagogy and teaching
mathematics for social justice. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy,
4(1).
Villegas, A. M. (1988). School failure and cultural mismatch: Another review. Urban
Review, 20(4), 253–265.