Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dysfunction (SD)
RoseMary Beitia
Appalachian State University
Definition
“Sexual dysfunction is characterized by disturbance in sexual
desire and in the psychophysiological changes that characterize
the sexual response cycle and cause marked distress and
interpersonal difficulty” – APA 2000
(APA, 2000; McAnulty, & Burnette, 2006; Segraves, & Althof, 1998)
Sexual Response Cycle
Kaplan (1974) consisted of the following:
Desire
Excitement
Orgasm
Limited focus on physical arousal
Rise of behavioral
techniques involving
systematic desensitization
pairing relaxation &
exposure methods
1970 -
1900-1950 1974
1950-1970
Psychoanalytic approach - Masters & Johnson
sexual problems were initiated a more
linked to unresolved, biopsychosocial model
unconscious conflicts during consisting of physical
specific developmental examinations, history of
periods dysfunction, education,
behavioral & cognitive
tasks, interpersonal issues;
proposed brief, problem
focused solutions
A Brief History continued
Helen Singer Kaplan’s
The New Sex Therapy
integrating M&J
approach with
psychodynamic
methods
1980 - current
1974-1980
Neo-Masters & Mid-1980’s dawned the
Johnson Era medicalization era; including
combined CBT &
pharmaceutical treatments; but
has not had as significant an
impact on female sexual
dysfunction
Phases of the Sexual
Response
As a function of “normal” sexual responding:
(APA, 2000)
DSM-TR Diagnoses cont’d
Sexual pain disorders
Dyspareunia (not due to GM condition)
Vaginismus (not due to GM condition)
Sexual Dysfunction Due to GM Condition
Substance-Induced Sexual Dysfunction
With impaired desire
With impaired arousal
With impaired orgasm
With sexual pain
With onset during intoxication
Sexual Dysfunction Not Otherwise Specified (NOS)
(APA, 2000)
Subtypes
Indicate onset:
Lifelong Type
Acquired Types
Context:
Generalized Type
Situational Type
Etiological Factors:
Due to Psychological Factors
Due to Combined Factors
(APA, 2000)
Other Sexual Dysfunctions
Paraphilias
Exhibitionism
Fetishism
Frotteurism
Pedophilia
Sexual Masochism
Sexual Sadism
Transvestic Fetishism
Voyeurism
Gender Identity Disorders
NOS
Dysphoria
(APA, 2000)
Desire Disorders
Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD)
DSM-IV Criteria:
Persistently or recurrently deficient (or absent) sexual
fantasies and desire for sexual activity
Not better accounted for by Axis I disorder (e.g.,
depression, anxiety) and not due to physiological effects of
a substance (e.g., alcohol, prescription medications)
Sexual Aversion Disorder (SAD)
DSM-IV Criteria :
Persistent or recurrent extreme aversion to, and
avoidance of, all (or almost all) genital sexual contact with
a sexual partner.
Not better accounted for by Axis I (e.g., PTSD)
Desire Disorders
General Understanding:
Highly comorbid (e.g., depression, anxiety, GMCs)
Quantified in terms of sex interest, rather than actual sexual behavior
Clinical Presentation:
Negative/ indifferent affect
Disparity in relationship member desire
Possess social expectations of “normal” sexual behavior
“Take it or leave it” attitude
Lack of attraction to partner
May be associated with trauma
Avoidance of sexual activity
When avoidance is accompanied by extreme aversion of genitals, SAD diagnoses may
be more accurate
Onset
Disorder present in all situations (e.g., global vs. specific)
“Treatment resistent”
(Metz, & Pryor, 2000; Wincze, Bach, & Blume, 2008; Wincze,& Carey, 2001)
Etiology
A Systemic Perspective
According to the systemic and “biopsychosocial”
model sexual response is the result of interaction
between the following 3 domains:
1. Biological – physiological mechanism that prepare and
enable genital response
2. Psychological – affective and cognitive predispositions
and interpretations that sustain response
3. Relational – dyadic interactions which promote intimacy,
meaning and mutually satisfying outcomes
Minimal Couple
Distress
One partner
Sexual Individual Sex Possible
Medical Therapy Couple Therapy
problem
Evaluation
Assessment One partner Individual Possible
& Integration Psychological Psychotherapy Couple Therapy Sex Therapy
Psychosocial of Information problem
Evaluation
Significant Couple
Couple Therapy
Distress
2. Physiology
Cognitive Restructuring
Education
Behavioral Intervention
Sex Therapy
Desire Disorders
Integration of Cognitive, Behavioral, Systemic Therapy
Stage 1: Affectual Awareness
Becoming aware of neg. attitudes/beliefs about sex and/or
partner
Create a set of lists (at least 5 items per list)
1. Benefits for lower drive individual gaining a higher level of sexual
desire
2. Benefits for relationship
3. Risks/costs of increasing sexual desire to self & relationship
Helps therapist & client gain understanding of:
Explore fears of gaining sexual desire
Influence of low desire on individual identity & within relationship
Therapist may also explore emotions related to “fear” lists
Role-play
Sex Therapy
Desire Disorders
Stage 2: Insight and Understanding
Therapist explains multicausality of SD
Limitations:
These interventions focus primarily
on restoring physiological sexual
responses
Lingering concerns:
Couple communication
Negative attitudes toward sex
Negative attitudes toward partner
Inaccurate beliefs about sex
Comorbidity
What is the primary diagnosis?
Challenges of Therapy
Many clients become discouraged or impatient due to:
Self-critical nature
Faulty attribute for SDs
Devaluing actual sexual response
Ignorance of process
Time urgency
Unrealistic expectations
Religious or cultural opposition to therapy (e.g.,
masturbation)
Compliance with HW assignments
Preference for pharmacotherapy alone
Noncompliance with medications (e.g., SSRIs for PE)
“Rolling with Resistance”
Encourage realistic self-assessment, expectations
Review accomplishments
Encourage communication of specific concerns to partner or
therapist
Encourage self-management:
Give specific instructions
Model or role-play techniques in session
Discuss how and when HW should be undertaken
Know the client’s medication schedule
Revisit cognitive distortions based on myths or false beliefs
Address resistance gently but directly
Advocate for client
*Stay aware of personal process issues in therapist
Are you becoming frustrated with a client?
Systemic Approach
David Schnarch, “Constructing the Sexual Crucible” (1997)
Sexual-marital therapy
Emphasize differentiation as the “central drive wheel” of
human relationships
Therapeutic focus directed at maximizing each partner’s
individual level of differentiation and facilitating greater
intimacy through self-differentiation
Goals:
Self-confrontation
Self-validation
Self-soothing
Emotional resilience through tolerance
Systemic Approach
Duration of treatment
Intensive format, 4 daily 3-hr sessions
Structure of treatment
Individualized content to each case (e.g., dependent on nature of
“gridlock”)
May incorporates sensate focus exercises but emphasizes emotion
connection & tolerance of partner
No bans on sex, physical stimulation and encouragement of fantasizing
Session 1:
During initial interview assess cognitions, beliefs, emotions & relational
patterns regarding sex
“Devil’s pact” – identify nature of high and low desire partner
discontentment
Validating each client’s concerns; working from a differentiation standpoint
Encourages high desire client to assume low desire client standpoint
Low desire client becomes anxious, due to high desire client’s lessen reactivity
Begin addressing issue at a deeper level setting stage for treatment
Systemic Approach
Session 2:
Refining the accuracy of the “lens”
Reframe, client or therapist driven
Into the crucible
Continuing with differentiation technique
Preface confrontation with validating statements “I am addressing the best in
you”
Construction of the crucible
Piecing together sexual history & individual histories of clients
Session 3:
Establishing the elicitation window
Involves tracking sexual patterns and meanings on current and historical
levels
Setting the stage for client differentiation
Focusing on emotional connections
Continued cognitive restructuring like exercises (e.g., list writing)
“hugging until relaxed” exercise
Systemic Approach
Session 4:
Continued resolution of power dynamics between high and low desire client
Both high & low level desire client differentiate with of self-confrontation and self-
soothing
Seeing one-self through sex
Clients exhibit tolerance of one another’s faults and inevitability of gridlock in marriage
Therapist may continually confront clients with basis of presenting problem
Observe level of differentiation
Termination
Clients & therapists process benefits, likes & difficulties
*Most suitable for multiple sexual & nonsexual issues due to integration of sex
therapy, couple therapy, & individual therapy
Back to slide