Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Syed Ali and Hugo Jhun Dr. Sanjai Kumar Chemistry & Biochemistry Department Queens College CUNY
Outline
Introduction Relevance to human cancer Research goals Procedure -Solid phase synthesis -Purification -Characterization -Enzymatic/Radioactive Assay Conclusion
Introduction
Nek2 is a Serine/Threonine centrosomal kinase that tightly regulates centrosome organization during mitosis.
NeK2 Kinase
Any aberrant role of centrosome can lead to chromosome instability, which can lead to aneuploidy.
Introduction
Nek8 is also a serine/threonine kinase, but it s functions are poorly understood as of now
Nek2 enzyme has been found to be abnormally expressed in many cancer cells.
Fig. 1. Increased Nek2 protein expression in primary breast tumours. Nek2 expression is substantially increased in the carcinoma cells (arrows) compared to the surrounding stromal cells with both the nucleus and cytoplasm staining for Nek2. Scale bars: (A) 100 (B) 30 m.
Overexpression of Nek8 occurs in Murine and feline juvenile polycystic kidney disease Human breast tumors Implicated in nephronphtisis Most likely mechanism is through mutation disrupting wild-type actin regulation
Research Goals
Many biological functions of NeK2/8 are still unknown. Design and synthesize specific activity-based sensors for monitoring Nek2/8 activity in vitro. Determine optimal sensor monitoring in vivo. Develop specific inhibitors of Nek2/8 enzyme
Figure 2. 14-3-3 proteins molecular anvils that mediate conformational changes or steric hindrance with functional consequences (Hermeking, 2003).
Figure 3.
nhanced Sensing of Protein Kinase Activity via a Deeply Quenched Kinase Peptide Substrate (Sharma et al., 2007).
PLM-8 O H HN CHC N CH CH 3 O CH 2 CH 3 O H CHC N CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 NH C NH NH 2 O H CHC N CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 NH C NH NH 2 O O O O H H H H CHC N CHC N CHC N CHC N CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CHCH 3 SH OH CH 2 CH 3 CH 2 NH C NH NH 2 O H CHC N CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 NH C NH NH 2 O CHC NH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 NH C NH NH 2
OH P Y R -A L A -G L U -T H R -S E R -L E U -V A L -T Y R -P R O
NEK8-PYR-162 O N H O O O O O H H H H N CHC N CHC N CHC N CH3 CH2 CHOH O CH2 CH3 C O NH2 O O O O O H H H H CHC N CHC N CHC N CHC N CHC N CH2 CH2 CH2 CHCH3 CH2 CH2 OH CHCH3 CH3 C O CH3 NH2 OH
O C NH2
PYR-miniPEG-ALA-GLU-THR-SER-LEU-VAL-TYR-PRO
H N
PY - i iPEG- i iPEG-
-GLU-THR- ER-LEU-
L-TYR-PRO
Experimental Procedure
To prepare the peptide sensor, we use the solid phase peptide method (SPPS). The general principle of SPPS is one of repeated cycles of coupling and Fmoc deprotection.
Deprotection Mechanism
Figure (a)
Figure (b) Fig. 5 (a) : Piperidine base attacks and removes proton from Fmoc. Fig. 5(b) : This next step is decarboxylation The result is CO2 and a free NH2 group on the resin, which will serve as the nucleophile in the reaction with carboxy group of amino acid.
We used three different reagents to do this test. For deprotection, the resin should be blue and the solution should be dark blue. (positive) For coupling, the resin should be clear and the solution should be light blue. (negative)
After the final coupling of 11Pyrenecarboxylic acid or acetyl group, we were ready for resin cleavage. We added Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), Water and of Triisopropysilane (TIS) (95:2.5:2.5) and gently shake the mixture for 3.5 hours.
Final purification was achieved by using Acetonitrile and water containing. Both contains 0.1% TFA.
HPLC Graph for SA-28
2998 at 254.00 - 2998 (210-800)nm 1.00 0.50 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 2998 at 335.00 - 2998 (210-800)nm
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00 Minutes
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
55.00
60.00
2.00
0.00 0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00 34.00 36.00 38.00 40.00 42.00 44.00 Minutes
1.00
0.00 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.00 2998 at 300.00 - 2998 (210-800)nm
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00 34.00 36.00 38.00 40.00 42.00 44.00 Minutes
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00 34.00 36.00 38.00 40.00 42.00 44.00 Minutes
Fig. 4. UV detector indicates time when the peptide was collected We used the Lyophilizer to remove the aqueous solution.
2.00 AU
1.00
SA-27
s yed-pep27-tune_090616112943 #1 RT: 0.00 T: ITMS + p ESI Full m s [200.00-1000.00] 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 518.67 50 45 40 35 291.42 30 298.58 25 428.58 20 15 10 229.00 5 0 200 343.42 322.58 392.58 281.00 370.50 592.50 476.50 535.58 605.33 625.42 685.50 744.17 780.58 794.83 843.50 907.92 953.08 716.08 985.75 354.83 502.67 569.42 AV: 1 NL: 3.10E1 436.50
M + /2 1
Relative Abundance
M+ 1 M +1 /3
444.67
872.17
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600 m /z
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
SA-28
M 1 +
SA28-1 #30 RT: 0.10 AV: 1 NL: 5.64E2 T: ITMS + p ESI Full m s [200.00-1000.00] 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 Relative Abundance 60 55 50 45 702.75 40 35 30 971.92 25 20 15 10 229.25 5 258.50 0 200 250 300 350 400 287.17 355.42 421.67 413.67 509.00 452.08 469.92 576.92 644.75 712.58 780.50 938.50 838.75 858.58
M + /2 1
430.17
M + 23
880.50
M/3 + 1
441.17
566.83
994.00
450
500
550
600 m /z
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
SA29-1 #30 RT: 0.08 AV: 1 NL: 7.89E3 T: ITMS + p ESI Full m s [300.00-1200.00] 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 Relative Abundance 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 619.67 20 15 663.67 10 5 0 300 408.58 372.67 458.58 564.92 592.83 685.75 325.00 486.92
SA-29
M/2 +1
971.75
M+1
M + 23 M/3 + 1
815.92 914.67 729.75 804.83 901.83 861.58 758.75 929.33 993.75 1051.25 1147.17 1085.17
503.33
430.33
400
500
600
700 m /z
800
900
1000
1100
1200
SA-30
M + /2 1
493.75
SA-30-1i #30 RT: 0.11 AV: 1 NL: 2.74E3 T: ITMS + p ESI Full m s [200.00-1100.00] 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 Relative Abundance 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20
M + 23 M+1
985.67
M +1 /3
829.67 379.67 533.58 1065.42 229.33 330.08 371.08 315.50 300 400 500 415.83 702.83 431.25 566.83 610.58 600 m /z 671.50 700 770.67 800 838.67 974.58 943.08 906.67 900
15 10 5 0 200
PLMPLM-7
PLM7-1 #30 RT: 0.09 AV: 1 NL: 6.01E4 T: ITMS + p ESI Full m s [200.00-1300.00] 414.58 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 Relative Abundance 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 621.08 25 311.58 20 15 10 5 249.42 0 200 300 400 385.67 464.92 500 600 700 m /z 452.25 677.58 734.50 543.00 791.33 800 870.42 928.33 1041.67 1000 1084.50 1100 1197.83 1200 1267.25 1300
M +1 /3
M + /2 1
M 1 +
900
PLMPLM-8
PLM8-1 #31 RT: 0.09 AV: 1 NL: 4.37E4 T: ITMS + p ESI Full m s [200.00-1300.00] 420.00 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 Relative Abundance 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 629.08 25 315.67 20 685.67 15 10 5 0 200 368.25 495.58 300 400 500 551.00 607.67 600 700 m /z 799.33 859.25 896.75 900 972.83 1016.92 1100.42 1100 1213.92 1200 1257.42 1300 457.67
M +1 /3
M + /2 1
742.50 252.67
800
1000
Fluoremetric Assay
1) The activity of our bio-senosr will be biojustified by fluorometer. fluorometer. 2) We will take our bio-sensor, ATP and bioobserve fluorescence activity. 3) 14-3-3 domain will be added to the 14solution and observe the fluorescence .
Radioactive Assay
1) 2) 3) 4) Sensors and enzymes are added to solution 32P-ATP is added to initiate kinase activity Kinase phosphorylates sensor Sensor is isolated and radioactive emission is recorded
Conclusion
We have successfully prepared nine peptides. Right now, we are preparing seven more peptides. After monitoring the activity of NeK2/8, we will observe the activity of NeK2/8 in living cells.
Acknowledgement
Dr. Sanjai Kumar for his great mentorship and guidance. Special thanks to Dr. Ravi Lankalapalli who modify our peptide protocol, create new method for HPLC ,improve the lyophilization procedure.
Reference
Nek2 kinase in chromosome instability and cancer Cancer Letters, Volume 237, Issue 2, 18 June 2006, Pages 155-166 Daniel G. Hayward, Andrew M. Fry
Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of a Series of Novel Inhibitor of Nek2/Hec1 Analogues Xiao-Long Qiu, Guideng Li, Guikai Wu, Jiewen Zhu, Longen Zhou, Phang-Lang Chen, A. Richard Chamberlin, Wen-Hwa Lee Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2009 52 (6), 1757-1767 Coordinate Regulation of the Mother Centriole Component Nlp by Nek2 and Plk1 Protein Kinases Joseph Rapley,1 Joanne E. Baxter,1 Joelle Blot,1 Samantha L. Wattam,1 Martina Casenghi,2 Patrick Meraldi,2 Erich A. Nigg,2 and Andrew M. Fry1
Reference
Liu S, Lu W, Obara T, Kuida S, Lehoczky J, Dewar K, Drummond IA Beier DR: A defect in a novel Nek-family kinase causes cystic kidney disease in the mouse and in zebrafish. Development 129: 5839 5846, 2002 Bowers AJ, Boylan JF: Nek8, a NIMA family kinase member, is overexpressed in primary human breast tumors. Gene 328: 135 142, 2004 Otto, E, Trapp, ML, Schultheiss, UT, Helou, J, Quarmby,LM, Hildebrandt, F. J Am Soc Nephrol 19: 587592, 2008