Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Poster Presentations
What is a poster?
http://www.asm.org/mtgsrc/pdfs/slide.pdf
http://courses.washington.edu/~hs590a/modules/19/ppposter.html
Why posters?
Used increasingly at conferences Highly suitable for new researchers or work in
progress
learning.lse.ac.uk/studyskills/ PhDWeek2005/PosterPresentations.ppt
Is there a format?
Similar to a paper presentation in your discipline, eg.
For science research should typically include: Abstract, introduction, methods, results and conclusion/discussion.
Examples of Layouts: 1
The Abstract:
brief synopsis of the entire work one or two paragraphs should contain the following elements:
(1) the purpose of the study, (2) a brief statement of what you did, (3) a concise statement of the major findings, (4) the major conclusions.
Examples of Layouts: 2
http://www.aas.duke.edu/trinity/research/vt/postertips.html
Examples of Layouts: 3
Examples of Layouts: 4
The Title
The parts: 1
Minimum number of words possible The title banner should be readable from
15 - 20 feet away. Title Case (NOT UPPER CASE) Beware of Word Art, ie.
Your Canvas
Visual representation: 1
1 clear flow of information
Clear Representation
Tell a story for the viewer with a clear flow of
information.
Visual representation 2
include
F R G P
21
Using templates
geology.about.com/library/bl/blposters_2.htm
geology.about.com/library/bl/blposters_2.htm
Conclusions
The good agreement between this finite difference scheme and the other methods for the trivial case indicates that the scheme is behaving as expected. This is encouraging and we are currently extending the model to describe dissolution from a multilayered tablet.
Tablet
Simple compressed system consisting of alternating layers of drug (salicylic acid) and excipient* (benzoic acid). Fig. 1: Multi-layered tablet
Environment
Nominally a USP 24 type 2 paddle dissolution apparatus, with the tablet positioned 3mm above the bottom.
3. It was used in associated studies. This allows us to compare their results with ours.
1.0 Dimensionless Concentration 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Normal Distance from Tablet Surface / cm
Finite Difference
Lvque
In the short term we hope to build a simple multilayered model and compare the results with previous work. In the medium to long term we will consider more realistic systems. Real dissolution systems (those in therapeutic use) have moving boundaries (as the drugs and excipients dissolve) and often the drug is dispersed through a matrix of excipient. Some real systems also use new polymer technologies to protect and deliver the drug. Simulating these systems will almost certainly require the use of alternative mathematical techniques. We look forward to these challenges.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Irish National Institute for Cellular Biotechnology (NICB) for supporting this work and Anne-Marie Healy in the School of Pharmacy at Trinity College Dublin who produced the experimental data mentioned in this poster.
Fig. 3: Simplified diffusion-advection equation For example, the diffusion is considered to be two-dimensional, steady state and from a flat plate rather than a cylinder. The equation is discretised using an explicit Forward Time Central Space (FTCS) finite difference scheme with initial values provided by the exact Lvque solution (cited by Schlichting [2]). The important results are the drug mass fluxes and transfer rates. Fig. 4: A comparison of drug concentration profiles at the trailing edge of the tablet Our estimate has a relative error of 0.9 % with respect to a semi-analytical (Pohlhausen type) solution proposed by Crane et al. [1] Mass fluxes computed by Crane et al. agree well with experimental data for both single layered (that is a tablet consisting purely of drug) and multi-layered tablets.
References
1. Crane, M. Crane, L. Healy, A. M. Corrigan, O.I. Gallagher, K.M. McCarthy L.G. 2003. A Pohlhausen Solution for the Mass Flux From a Multi-layered Compact in the USP Drug Dissolution Apparatus. Submitted to Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Elsevier, 2003. 2. Schlichting, H. 1979. Boundary-Layer Theory 7th Edition. New York ; London [etc.] : McGraw-Hill. Chap. XII p285 eqn. (12.51c). and p291 eqn. (12.60). Note: it seems there is a square root missing in the denominator of equation (12.60) in this edition.