Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modern implications
If we look at these two sequences from the angle of consent, or lack thereof, it becomes a reasonably powerful expression of both the importance of consent, and the destructive consequences of the absence of consent. I think it is worth keeping in mind that both Lenina and John are destroyed in the non-consensual act - both physically and psychologically. There are simply no good outcomes from either of these non-consensual acts. Both are framed by violence and so are immediately connected to pain and destruction and both result in psychological pain. So, while Huxley was definitely not an avid campaigner for consent and stronger understanding of consent, I think this is potentially a really interesting way to read the text in light of modern issues around sex and sexual violence. There is a really clear lesson that can be read into the work here: that ultimately, a lack of consent is destructive for both parties - it denies any positive connection and can lead to an ongoing sense of shame, which will always be a destructive force.