Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microeconomics
Applied Microeconomics
Economics of the
Environment
ECONOMICS OF THE ENVIRONMENT
Factor services
Total
damage
Environmental damage
O
W1 Waste
ECONOMICS OF THE ENVIRONMENT
MC pollution
Costs and benefits (£)
P4
P3
P2
O Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
MB− MC
Output of good
ECONOMICS OF THE ENVIRONMENT
MC pollution
Costs and benefits (£)
P4
P3
O Q1 Q3 Q4
MB− MC
Output of good
ECONOMICS OF THE ENVIRONMENT
■ Market-based policies
✜ extending private property rights
P2
MB = MSB
P1 = 0
L2 L1
Level of emission
ECONOMICS OF THE ENVIRONMENT
■ Market-based policies
✜ extending private property rights
✜ charging for use of the environment
✜ environmental ('green') taxes
A socially efficient green tax
MC pollution
Costs and benefits (£)
Socially efficient
green tax
P1
O Q1 Q2
MB− MC
Output of good
Green tax revenues as a % of GDP
Green tax revenues as a % of GDP
ECONOMICS OF THE ENVIRONMENT
■ Non-market-based policies
✜ command-and-control systems
✦ technology-based standards
✦ ambient-based standards
✦ social-impact standards
✜ voluntary agreements
✜ education
ECONOMICS OF THE ENVIRONMENT
■ Tradable permits
✜ how they work
✜ assessment of the system
A B Small loss C
Cut pollution Large loss
Moderate for USA for USA
net gain for all Gain for Slight gain for
USA’s countries not other countries
strategy cutting pollution
Don’t cut D E F
High gain Fairly high No gain
pollution for USA gain for USA for any
Small gain for Loss for other country
other countries countries
Applied Microeconomics
UK
Energy and Transport in Figures (EC, 2002); Federal Highway Administration: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/qfvehicles.htm
Increase in car ownership
USA
Cars per thousand population
UK
Energy and Transport in Figures (EC, 2002); Federal Highway Administration: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/qfvehicles.htm
Increase in car ownership
USA
Cars per thousand population
Sweden Belgium
UK
Energy and Transport in Figures (EC, 2002); Federal Highway Administration: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/qfvehicles.htm
Increase in car ownership
USA
Germany
Cars per thousand population
W Germany
Sweden Belgium
UK
Energy and Transport in Figures (EC, 2002); Federal Highway Administration: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/qfvehicles.htm
Increase in car ownership
USA
Germany
Cars per thousand population
W Germany
Sweden Belgium
UK Spain
Energy and Transport in Figures (EC, 2002); Federal Highway Administration: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/qfvehicles.htm
TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND
TRANSPORT POLICIES
MSB
O
Cars per minute
Costs and benefits (£) Actual and optimum road usage
MC (private)
MSB
O
Cars per minute
Costs and benefits (£) Actual and optimum road usage
MC (private)
e
a
MSB
O Q1
Cars per minute
Actual and optimum road usage
MSC
Costs and benefits (£)
MC (private)
b
e
a
MSB
O Q1
Cars per minute
Actual and optimum road usage
MSC
Costs and benefits (£)
MC (private)
d Optimum
b charge
e
a c
MSB
O Q2 Q1
Cars per minute
TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND
TRANSPORT POLICIES
■ Policy 1: direct provision
✜ the road solution
✜ public transport
■ Policy 2: regulation and legislation
✜ restricting car access
✦ bus and cycle lanes
✦ no entry to side streets
✦ pedestrian-only areas
✜ parking restrictions
TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND
TRANSPORT POLICIES
Competition Policy
COMPETITION POLICY
Monopoly
P1
AR = D
MR
O Q1 Q
Equilibrium of industry under perfect competition and
monopoly: with the same MC curve
£ MC ( = supply under
perfect competition)
Comparison with
P1 Perfect competition
P2
AR = D
MR
O Q1 Q2 Q
Equilibrium of industry under perfect competition and
monopoly: with different MC curves
£
MCmonopoly
P1
AR = D
MR
O Q1 Q
Equilibrium of industry under perfect competition and
monopoly: with different MC curves
£ MC ( = supply)perfect competition
MCmonopoly
P2
ACmonopoly
P1
x
P3
P4
AR = D
MR
O Q2 Q1 Q3 Q4 Q
COMPETITION POLICY
■ EU legislation
✜ assessing EU policy
COMPETITION POLICY
■ UK competition policy
✜ the OFT and the Competition Commission
✜ restrictive practices policy
✦ Chapter 1 prohibition
✦ types of anti-competitive behaviour
✦ powers of the OFT
✜ monopoly policy
✦ Chapter 2 prohibition
✦ market-share criterion
✦ market contestability
✦ anti-competitive practices
COMPETITION POLICY
Privatisation
PRIVATISATION
LRAC
Q
Profit-maximising natural monopoly
£
LRAC
LRMC
Q
Profit-maximising natural monopoly
£
LRAC
LRMC
D
Q
Profit-maximising natural monopoly
£
LRAC
LRMC
D
MR Q
Profit-maximising natural monopoly
£
Pm
LRAC
LRMC
D
Qm Q
MR
Profit-maximising natural monopoly
£
Pm
LRACm
LRAC
LRMC
D
Qm Q
MR
Profit-maximising natural monopoly
£
Pm
LRACm
LRAC
Pn
LRMC
D
Qm Qn
MR Q
PRIVATISATION
■ Arguments against privatisation
✜ natural monopolies
✜ capital costs and entry barriers
PRIVATISATION
■ Arguments against privatisation
✜ natural monopolies
✜ capital costs and entry barriers
✜ lack of co-ordination of industries
PRIVATISATION
■ Arguments against privatisation
✜ natural monopolies
✜ capital costs and entry barriers
✜ lack of co-ordination of industries
✜ externalities
PRIVATISATION
■ Arguments against privatisation
✜ natural monopolies
✜ capital costs and entry barriers
✜ lack of co-ordination of industries
✜ externalities
✜ fairness and social justice
PRIVATISATION
■ Arguments against privatisation
✜ natural monopolies
✜ capital costs and entry barriers
✜ lack of co-ordination of industries
✜ externalities
✜ fairness and social justice
✜ problems with the PSNCR
PRIVATISATION
■ Arguments against privatisation
✜ natural monopolies
✜ capital costs and entry barriers
✜ lack of co-ordination of industries
✜ externalities
✜ fairness and social justice
✜ problems with the PSNCR
■ Ownership and the public interest
Applied Microeconomics
Regulation
REGULATION
■ Identifying short-run optimum price
and output
✜ industry has monopoly power
✦ the first-best situation
✦ second-best pricing rules
✜ industry produces externalities
✜ questions of fairness
■ Identifying long-run optimum price and
output
Short-run and long-run marginal cost pricing
£
MSC
PS
D = AR
O QS Q
Short-run and long-run marginal cost pricing
£
MSC
PS
PL LRMSC
D = AR
O QS QL Q
REGULATION
■ Regulation in practice: RPI – X formula
■ Advantages of UK regulation
✜ discretionary; flexible
✜ incentives
■ Disadvantages of UK regulation
✜ disincentives of changes to X
✜ excessive power of regulator?
✜ playing ‘games’ with industry
✜ alternatively, regulatory capture
✜ complexity of regulation
REGULATION
■ Increasing competition in the privatised
industries
✜ limited extent of true natural monopoly
✜ allowing competition where there is no
natural monopoly
✜ allowing access to grids by competitors
✜ forbidding suppliers from being grid owners
✜ capping market share of established firms
✜ competitive franchising to make monopolies
contestable
Applied Microeconomics
Privatisation in
Transition Economies
PRIVATISATION IN TRANSITION
ECONOMIES
■ State ownership under communism
✜ the system of central planning
✜ problems of inconsistency
✜ inappropriate success indicators and
rewards
✜ results
■ Transition to a market economy
✜ forms of market liberalisation
✜ degree of transition achieved
PRIVATISATION IN TRANSITION
ECONOMIES
■ Privatisation
✜ forms of privatisation
✜ insider and outsider privatisation
■ Requirements for successful
privatisation
✜ supportive environment
✜ price liberalisation
✜ restructuring of firms
✜ corporate governance