Professional Documents
Culture Documents
\
|
c
c
}
dx f
x
u
EA x |
| | | | U N u
T
=
| || | | | F U K =
15
STRESS ANALYSIS
Linear elastic
Hydraulic Manifold
3-D solid elements
In-service pressure
68 MPa
| || | | | F U K =
| | | || | U B = c
| | | || | c o D =
16
STRESS ANALYSIS
Non-linearity
Iterative solution
Incremental solution
Road sweeping brush
Large deformation
Penetration of 50 mm
| || | | | F U U K = ) (
| || | | | F U U K A A A = A ) (
17
Material non-linearity
Autofrettage
(manufacturing barrels of handguns
and cannons)
Mandrel residual hoop stress
2-D axsymmetric model
Overstrain
STRESS ANALYSIS
% 100
=
i
i m
R
R R
|
18
HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS
Governing differential equation
FE equation (transient analysis)
Numerical integration
Steady state analysis
|
|
.
|
\
|
c
c
+
c
c
+
c
c
=
c
c
2
2
2
2
2
2
z
T
y
T
x
T
c
K
t
T
p
| | | || | | | q T K
t
T
C = +
(
c
c
t
t T t t T
t
T
A
A +
=
c
c ) ( ) (
| || | | | q T K =
19
HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS
Steady state analysis
Railko Marine Bearing
Two layers: a backing and a liner
2-D plane heat transfer elements
Inside T
i
=100
o
C, outside T
o
=30
o
C
20
Governing differential equation
Heat transfer
Lap strap CFRP
Transient analysis
DIFFUSION ANALYSIS
|
|
.
|
\
|
c
c
+
c
c
+
c
c
=
c
c
2
2
2
2
2
2
z
T
y
T
x
T
c
K
t
T
p
|
|
.
|
\
|
c
c
+
c
c
+
c
c
=
c
c
2
2
2
2
2
2
z
c
y
c
x
c
D
t
c
/s m 10 3 . 9
2 13
=
a
D
/s m 10 6 . 3
2 13
=
CFRP
D
21
Multi-physics analysis
Thermal-stress analysis of the Railko bearing
COUPLED-FIELD ANALYSIS
T
t
A = o c
ref
T T T = A
22
Modelling of macro-crack
Crack faces should coincident
LEFM
EPFM
Composites
FRACTURE MECHANICS ANALYSIS
r u
r
1
o
r
1
c
1
1
+
m
m
r
c
1
1
1
+
m
r
o
r u
1
c r
23
Fatigue crack initiation
Damage variable D
Evolution of D in adhesive layer used for scarf joint
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
( )( )
1
1
2 /
1 1 1
+ +
+
(
A + + =
m
V
m
eq
N R m A D
|
| |
o |
24
Fatigue crack propagation
A modified Paris law
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
(
(
(
(
(
|
|
.
|
\
|
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
2
1
max
max
max
1
1
n
c
n
th
n
G
G
G
G
DG
dN
da
25
Fatigue crack propagation
A single lap joint
Total strain energy release rate
(G
max
or G
T
)
Mode I strain energy release rate
(G
I
)
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
26
FE equation - generalised equation of motion
Un-damped free vibration
Solution
FE equation becomes
Eigenvalue problem is solved using iterative numerical
solution
MODAL ANALYSIS
| || | | || | | || | | | F U K U C U M = + +
| || | | || | 0 = + U K U M
| | | | ) sin( e + = t U U
n m
( )| | 0 ] [ ] [
2
=
m n
U M K e
27
Free vibration of a pre-stressed concrete bridge,
B14, between the villages Peutie and Melsbroek
and crosses the highway E19
3-D finite element model
MODAL ANALYSIS
28
FE equation - generalised equation of motion
Explicit direct numerical integration
TRANSIENT DYNAMICS ANALYSIS
| || | | || | | || | | | F U K U C U M = + +
| | | | ) ( ) (
2
1
) ( t t U t t U
t
t U A A +
A
=
| | | | ) ( ) ( 2 ) (
1
) (
2
t t U t U t t U
t
t U A + A +
A
=
29
A footbridge, Wilcott bridge
FRP composite
Shrewsbury, UK
3-D beam elements
Excited using a walking
Pedestrian (1.6 Hz)
BS5400: F(t)=180sin(.t) N
TRANSIENT DYNAMICS ANALYSIS
30
Governing partial differential equation -LWR (Lighthill,
Witham and Richards) model
FE equation
A simulation of a 5 km road
BC at x=0
TRAFFIC FLOW ANALYSIS
0 =
c
c
+
c
c
x
k
u
t
k
o
| | | || | 0 = +
(
c
c
k B
t
k
A
31
The Finite Element Method is a generic technique
Many disciplines and applications
FEA is well established numerical technique
However, research and development into FEM is still
going on in order to improve accuracy, facilitate the user
interaction with the software and further implementation of
specific applications.
CONCLUSIONS
32
QUESTIONS