Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brief Background
Developed by staff members of the OT Department at Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital (LRH) in Israel
History
1973 Israeli soldiers with head injuries admitted to LRH; led to development of LOTCA 1990 LOTCA Battery first published 2000 Second edition released
Originally for clients with brain damage (e.g., TBI, CVA, brain tumors) Suitable for assessment in other populations where cognitive status has to be established (e.g., SCI, degenerative and psych dse, underachieving students)
Administration
3o to 45 minutes Can be divided into 2-3 sessions or lesser time if necessary Procedures for assessing aphasic clients are incorporated
Administration
Scoring sheet provides profile of clients performance No additional cues should be given for any subtest READ carefully BEFORE administration Side-by-Side most sub-tests Face-to-face - spatial perception and praxis subtests
Administration Examiner should be alert for clients motor slowing or restlessness and continue the assessment at a later time
Administration
At the end of the assessment
Indicate length of time taken Indicate if additional sessions are needed
Scoring
Most tests =
1 (low) to 4 (high)
TESTS
Orientation Visual Perception Spatial Perception Motor Praxis Visuomotor Organization Thinking Operations Attention Span and Concentration
Orientation
Awareness of self in relation to ones surroundings Requires consistent and reliable integration of attention, perception and memory
Orientation
Deficits are among the most frequent symptoms of brain diseases Impaired awareness of time and place
Most common Accompanies every brain disorder in which attention or retention is affected
Orientation
Impaired orientation strongly suggestive of cerebral dysfunction Good orientation not evidence of cognitive or attentional competence
Orientation
Test items are impossible to administer if client has comprehension difficulties (e.g. receptive aphasia). If clients comprehension is good and he/she has only expressive difficulties, he/she may respond with yes or no to multiple choices provided by examiner.
OP Scoring
2 points for every correct answer 1 point only if answer was given by way of multiple choice
OP Scoring
Minimal performance Maximal performance 1 point No correct answer 1 correct answer by multiple choice 8 points Answered correctly all questions without the need for multiple choice
Orientation for Time (OT) a. Client is asked for the full date.
What day is today? What month? What year? What season is it now?
b.Client is then asked to estimate the time (without looking at the watch).
What is the hour now?
Orientation for Time (OT) c. He/she is also asked how long he/she is hospitalized.
How long have you been hospitalized?
OT Scoring
2 points for every correct answer 1 point only if answer was given by way of multiple choice
OT Scoring
Minimal performance Maximal performance 1 point No correct answer 1 correct answer by multiple choice 8 points Answered correctly all questions without the need for multiple choice
Total disorientation for place and time indicates a confusioned state. Generally, OP improves before OT.
Visual Perception
Active process of: searching for the corresponding information, distinguishing the essential features of an object, comparing the features with each other, creating appropriate hypotheses, and then comparing these hypotheses with the original data.
Visual Perception
Perceptual abilities tested range from the identification of clear pictures of objects to identification of objects photographed from unusual angles, distinction of overlapping figures, and recognition of spatial relations.
Subtests for Visual Perception Object Identification (OI) Shape Identification (SI) Overlapping Figures (OF) Object Constancy (OC)
Requires:
OI Cards Test Booklet (pages 1-4)
OI Scoring
1 point <4 objects by exact matching 2 points 5-8 objects by exact matching 3 points 4-7 objects by naming, understanding, or similar matching 4 points 8 objects by naming, understanding or similar matching.
SI Scoring
1 point < 4 shapes by exact matching 2 points 5-8 shapes by exact matching 3 points 4-7 shapes by naming, pointing or similar matching 4 points 8 shapes by naming, pointing, or similar matching.
Requires:
OF Cards Test Booklet (pages 9-10)
OF Scoring
1 point o figures identified or < 3 with board 2 points 3 figures with board 3 points 4 figures without board or all figures with board 4 points all figures with board
OC Scoring
1 point 0-1 objects identified 2 points 2 objects identified 3 points 3 objects identified 4 points 4 objects identified
Spatial Perception
Difficulty in right-left discrimination
incapacity to apply this distinction to symmetrical parts of the body disorder of spatial orientation related to own body or a confronting person
Spatial Perception
Visual spatial agnosia
Deficit in perceiving spatial relationships between objects or between objects and self Difficulties in spatial relations on the own body Difficulties in judging distances and in depth perception
Spatial Perception
Perceptual functions are the most basic of cognitive abilities. Client who exhibits difficulties in this part of the battery will most probably demonstrate further difficulties in the following parts.
Spatial Perception
Perception disabilities influence clients functioning in everyday life, e.g.:
Severe perception d/o (visual agnosia) problems in all areas of everyday life Figure ground discrimination problems fail to find a desired object among several others. Spatial perception problems disabilities in ADL, including dressing, ambulation, etc.
Spatial Perception
More common in right hemisphere lesions Frontal lobe lesions poor perception secondary to:
Motivation Initiation Integration
Face to face
SP1 Scoring
1 point given for every correct response Minimal performance 1 point Maximal performance 4 points
SP2 Scoring
1 point given for every correct response Minimal performance 1 point Maximal performance 4 points
SP3 Scoring
1 point given for every correct response Minimal performance 1 point Maximal performance 4 points
Motor Praxis
Apraxia
disturbance of purposeful expressive functions breakdown of motor integration and executive functions integral to the performance of complex learned acts Confusing terminology with the use of ideometer, ideational and idiokinetic apraxia in different ways Test will use the term in a descriptive way (Lezak, 1983)
Motor Praxis
Praxis motor planning ability to execute motor functions
P1 Scoring
1 point given for every correct response Minimal performance 1 point Maximal performance 4 points
P2 Scoring
1 point given for every correct response Minimal performance 1 point Maximal performance 4 points
How do you open a door with a key? How do you cut a loaf of bread with a knife? How do you use a telephone?
Examiner will ask client to show the whole action, from lifting the receiving, dialing, and bringing the receiver to the ear.
P3 Scoring
1 point given for every correct response Minimal performance 1 point Maximal performance 4 points
Full score can be given for mirroring and contralateral imitation. (Sub-test is for measuring praxis, not right/left discrimination).
Visuomotor Organization
Embraces three large classes of activities: Copying Drawing Building or assembling Variability in the tendency of problems in these classes to occur together makes it important to evaluate these activities together (Lezak, 1983).
Visuomotor Organization
Combines perceptual activity with motor response and always has a spatial component Damage to either left or right brain hemisphere may cause difficulties in constructional performance.
Visuomotor Organization
Right hemisphere damage piecemeal, fragmented approach, losing the overall gestalt of the construction task Left-sided lesions may get overall idea, but tend to lose details, and in general turn out a shabby production
Visuomotor Organization
Frontal lobe syndrome tend to fragment, simplify, and usually need support in order to perform the construction Difficulties are usually expressed in ADL tasks as well as in the performance of complicated activities of any kind
Pegboard Construction (PC) Colored Block Design (CB) Plain Block Design (PB) Reproduction of a Puzzle (RP) Drawing of a Clock (DC) In all subtests, time of performance must be measured and written into the scoring sheet.
GF Scoring
1 point zero to one form copied 2 points two or three forms copied 3 points four forms copied 4 points all five forms copied
a. Examiner shows client a design that consists of a circle, a rectangle and two triangles and the corresponding shapes. b. Examiner says, Construct this pattern beside the design.
c. If client fails to do it, examiner instructs client, Now try to construct it on the design.
TM Scoring
1 point unable to reproduce pattern 2 points able to reproduce pattern only on the design 3 points reproduces the pattern correctly but with trial and error 4 points good performance
Client able to construct shape, but does not locate the right position in the board
PC Scoring
1 point unable to perform 2 points able to reproduce only the vertical and horizontal lines; he/she fails to reproduce the oblique lines and/or fails to close the angles 3 points reproduces the form correctly, but does not locate it in the right place on the board 4 points good performance
Another common error is the tendency to build the pattern on the surface without relating to height and/or depth
CB Scoring
1 point unable to reproduce the design 2 points builds flat on the table, without height and depth, or partially flat 3 points builds with height only or depth only 4 points good performance
PB Scoring
1 point unable to reproduce the design and does not count correctly 2 points builds what he sees but does not build invisible blocks 3 points does not count correctly but builds correctly or vice versa 4 points good performance
RP Scoring
1 point unable to perform 2 points only able to put in the three central vertical pieces 3 points performs with trial and error but achieves good performance 4 points good performance without trial and error
a. Examiner gives client a pencil and a drawing of a circle (page 25 of the test booklet).
b. Client is instructed, Fill in the numbers of the clock and put the hands of the clock at 10:15.
Meaningful difference between clients who make a primary organization of the clock and clients who start performing with any initial planning
Clients with left hemisphere lesions involving aphasia and dysgraphia may have difficulties in writing numbers
DC Scoring
1 point unable to perform 2 points performs the general scheme, but the organization within it is not correct 3 points organizes the numbers of the clock correctly, but fails to mark the hour; or vice versa; marks the hour correctly, but the numbers are not placed exactly right 4 points good performance
Thinking Operations
Thinking
Not tied to specific neuroanatomical systems unlike other intellectual systems (Luria, 1966) Function of the entire brain (Gloring & Hoff, 1969)
Thinking Operations
Basic level of thinking operations process of conceptualization
Identify discrete features of objects Appreciate object hierarchically Classify objects into basic categories
Thinking Operations
More advanced level
Client deals with logical operations Demands apprehension of sequence
Thinking Operations
Two basic thinking operations (Piaget)
Classification Seriation
Thinking Operations
Three kinds of test for assessing thinking operations
Categorization tests
x Objects categorization x Forms classification
Sequential tests
x Pictorial sequence x Geometrical sequence
Thinking Operations
Brain damage
Reduces the level of performance of cognitive tasks Reduces the ability to process information that is needed for grouping things in relevant categories Limits the ability to organize the information required for planning acts
Categorization (CA)
a. Examiner spreads randomly on the table 14 cards with these representations:
boat, helicopter, airplane, bicycle, ship, train, car, hammer, scissors, needle, screwdriver, wheelbarrow, hoe, rake
Categorization (CA)
c. After client has done the first grouping, examiner asks:
Is there another possible way to sort them? Name the groups.
Categorization (CA)
Attention is paid to whether client:
Sorts according to what criterion Can formulate the criterion Follows criterion constantly
Client is expected to shift concepts and sort the objects according to another criterion. There are various levels at which the common features of objects can be abstracted
Categorization (CA)
Main problems exhibited:
Determining a criterion Preserving a criterion Shifting concepts Verbally conceptualizing Client may be able to sort into small groups, but unable to shift to larger groups (needs higher level of abstraction) May be able to generalize one group but fail to do it in the other one
CA Scoring
1 point unable to perform 2 points able to do partial grouping (either large groups or small groups) 3 points able to do both tasks, but shifts only with a cue, and/or is unable to complete the groupings 4 points able to perform, with or without a cue, but is unable to verbally conceptualize the criterion 5 points Good performance. Client can perform and verbalize the criterion. If client did not get max score due to language problems, examiner will add comment beside the score.
Both tests together enable a more complete assessment of the classification ability.
RU Scoring
Highest score of any of the various trials is given when client is able to perform and state the criteria (except in cases of aphasia).
RU Scoring
1 point Identification: i.e., exact matching (pairs of color and shape), and/or collections (e.g., uses pieces to make a picture like a house or flower) 2 points sorts according to one incomplete criterion (leaves some pieces out or mixes two criteria)
RU Scoring
3 points sorts according to one criterion with spatial arrangement (e.g., arranges the oval shapes in one line or row and the arrows underneath) 4 points sorts according to one criterion with random arrangement and is able to shift to another criterion (color and then shape, for example) 5 points sorts according to two criteria or more simultaneously (e.g., shape and color using more than two in a group)
RS Scoring
1 point identifies, i.e., exact matching (pairs of color and shape), and/or collections (e.g., uses pieces to make a picture like a house or flower) 2 points sorts according to one incomplete criterion (leaves some pieces out or mixes two criteria) 3 points sorts according to one criterion
RS Scoring
4 points sorts according to two criteria simultaneously only on second trial, after examiner has offered a clue 5 points sorts according to two criteria simultaneously on first trial
Pictorial Sequence (PS) Telling the story enables examiner to evaluate clients ability to verbally organize sequentially ordered visual data
PS1 Scoring
1 point unable to perform 2 points uses only some of the cards, but does not refer to the whole sequence 3 points able to tell the story, but is not able to arrange the cards correctly; or able to arrange the cards, but unable to tell the story 4 points good performance
Pictorial Sequence
Second sequence of six cards is given:
If client has score of 4 Aphasic clients arranged the cards but were not able to tell the story
PS2 Scoring
Same as PS1 Examiner will write in comments if client did not get the max score because of language problems If the score on PS1 is less than 4, PS2 should have no score
a. Examiner gives client a pencil and the first geometrical sequence (page 26). b. Examiner says, In this line, the forms are drawn in a special order. Continue the sequence according to this order.
GS Scoring
1 point unable to perform 2 points performs only the first sequence 3 points performs both sequences, but with trial and error 4 points good performance For the second sequence, client must show at least two more shapes (line sets) to be scored.
F I N I S H