Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 3
Religious Ethics
There are arguments for & against religious ethics:
Advantage of Religion: Provides sanctions. Criticism: Sanctions are too remote.
Advantage: Faith in God is the center of a Christians life. Criticism: Social utility should be number 1 for a moral person, not incidental to following Gods word. Time spent in church could be time spent feeding the poor, for example.
Religious Ethics
Criticism: Religious dogma can lead to tragedy, such as the Spanish Inquisition.
Also, religious dogma can stifle inquiring minds.
Reply to criticism: Fallible human beings are to blame for these tragedies, not religion properly understood.
Religious Ethics
Criticism: Consistent Christians should believe their God is the answer. Thus they should try to convert others in order to save them from eternal damnation. Answer: Christianity has mellowed since then. Christians now work effectively with Muslims and Jews.
Religious Ethics
Advantage: Religion has good uses. Criticism: Do we teach people to believe in a certain religion because it is useful or because it is true? Pascals wager. Is this anything more than an appeal to force? Russell: How do you know that there isnt a God who respects intellectual honesty, and basing ones beliefs on evidence rather than faith, so much that he will throw into hell anyone who adheres to a religion just to be on the winning side?
Religious Ethics
Euthyphro (page 83)
Is an act right independently of Gods command?
Natural Law
The theory of natural law has three main parts:
1. The Theory of Natural Law rests upon a certain view of what the world is like. This view holds that the world has a rational purpose built into nature. Everything in nature has a purpose. 2. The Laws of Nature not only describe how things are but how they ought to be as well. 3. We can grasp the Laws of Nature because God has made us rational creatures.
Natural Law
Criticisms of natural law:
What makes something unnatural? Hearing aids are not found in nature. Diseases are found in nature: cures are unnatural because they are discovered by humans? Is being natural always good? See pages 86-87.
Kantian Ethics
2nd Commandment: Love thy neighbor as thyself.
What does this mean? Should you love the entire human race equally? Even child molesters and serial killers? Should you love everyone as much as you love your own family? What if you are working on a project and some remote acquaintance is hungry and needs food? Should you drive a half day to feed him/her? Should you do this for everyone? Do you rally have to sell all thou hast and give to the poor? Then you will be poor and forced to rely on the possible charity of others. Golden rule can be problematic because of different strokes for different folks.
Kantian Ethics
2nd Commandment: Love thy neighbor as thyself.
What does this mean? Should you love the entire human race equally? Even child molesters and serial killers? Should you love everyone as much as you love your own family? What if you are working on a project and some remote acquaintance is hungry and needs food? Should you drive a half day to feed him/her? Should you do this for everyone? Do you rally have to sell all thou hast and give to the poor? Then you will be poor and forced to rely on the possible charity of others. Kant said we should follow universal moral laws.
Kantian Ethics
Kants Theory of Duty
Animals act from inclination. Only human beings are capable of acting on principle. Feelings and attitudes differ from person to person. However, reason is universal. If A is larger than B, and B is larger that C than A is larger than C universally. Every rational person would have to agree with this conclusion.
Kantian Ethics
A hypothetical imperative is different than a categorical imperative. The Categorical Imperative: Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. Charity and Payment of debts are Kants examples. Deontological ethics holds that the rightness of an act is derived from its logical consistence and universalizability. the character of the act itself rather than the consequences is what matters the character of the act itself is determined by its maxim. Case of murderer looking for friend and Kants response. Critics ask why there cant be exceptions and qualifications.
Kantian Ethics
Example: Truman vs. Anscombe Treating persons as ends
Act in such a way that you treat humanity whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means. See pages 98-99.