Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Planning
Project Evaluation
Project Implementation
Project Evaluation
It is a systemic and objective assessment of an ongoing or completed project (ILO Technical Operation Manual) Systematic Investigation of the worth or merit of an object, i.e., project (NSF Handbook for Project Evaluation)
Evaluation is Important
The importance of Evaluation lies in its aims:
A. Determine the level of achievement of the project objectives B. Development effectiveness, Efficiency, Impact and Sustainability C. Provides information to help improve the project D. Building understanding, motivation and capacity amongst involved in the project
Evaluation is Important
The importance of Evaluation lies in its aims:
E. Helping empower project partners F. Provides information to help improve the project, and G. Provides new insights or new information that was not anticipated
Outputs Inputs
(Investments)
Impacts
Positive and negative; and primary and secondary effects of a project intervention. Often detectable after several years.
Levels of Evaluation
Levels of Evaluation
Program
Project
Project
Projects
Activities
Activities
Activities
Levels of Evaluation
Project Evaluation:
Focuses on an individual project funded under the umbrella of a program. Evaluation collects data to improve the project as it develops and progresses. Information is also gathered for the purpose of whether the project has proceeded as planned, and has it reached its programs goal or the projects objectives
Types of Evaluation
Evaluators Self-Evaluation Agency/Project Managers Themselves From the Agency but not necessarily part of the project External Evaluators + Independent Members from the Agency External Evaluators with no previous links with the project
Internal Evaluation
Medium
Medium
Medium to High
High
High
High
Evaluation Types
Frequency of Evaluation
Frequency of Evaluation
Per ILO Technical Cooperation Manual, the frequency of evaluation proceeds in:
A. Technical cooperation projects of 18 months duration or less require a final evaluation upon completion; B. Projects of 18 to 30 months duration require annual reviews and a final evaluation upon completion; C. Projects of over 30 months duration require annual reviews, an interim evaluation and a final evaluation upon completion; D. All projects with a budget of over US$ 500,000 require an independent evaluation at least once during the project cycle; and E. Independent evaluations are required before starting a new phase.
Frequency of Evaluation
Annual reviews
Self-Evaluations that are managed by the project management itself.
Interim Evaluations
Takes Place halfway through the project implementation.
Additional Evaluation
Takes place when there is a need for readjustment of the project objectives
Formative Evaluation
Formative Evaluation assesses initial and ongoing project activities. 2 Components:
A. Implementation Evaluation B. Progress Evaluation
Formative Evaluation
Implementation Evaluation
The purpose of Implementation evaluation is to assess whether the project is being conducted as planned.
Formative Evaluation
Progress Evaluation
The purpose of progress implementation is to assess progress in meeting goals of the program and the project. This evaluation measures the progress at the various stages of intervention.
Summative Evaluation
Summative evaluation assesses the quality and impact of a fully implemented project. Summative Evaluation collects information about outcomes and related processes, strategies and activities.
Summative Evaluation
Basic questions:
A. To what extent does the project meet the stated goals? B. Are greater number of the target population has shown significant changes? C. Which components are effective? Which are not? D. Were the results worth the cost? E. Is the program sustainable?
What to Evaluate?
Evaluation Criteria:
A. Relevance and Strategic fit of the project B. Validity of the Project Design C. Project Progress and Effectiveness D. Efficiency of resource use E. Effectiveness of the Management Arrangement F. Impact Orientation and Sustainability of the Project
Validity of Design
What was the baseline condition at the beginning of project? How was it established? Was a gender analysis carried out? Are the planned project objectives and outcomes relevant and realistic to the situation on the ground? Do they need to be adapted to specific (local, sectoral, etc.) needs or conditions? Is the intervention logic coherent and realistic? What needs to be adjusted?
Advantage/Disadvantages: Here.
Evaluation Report
Evaluation Report
Before any evaluation report will be presented, a terms of reference (TOR) of the evaluation will be first presented (and prepared by the evaluation manager) for comments to the following stakeholders (ILO) and before the evaluation proper:
A. Project Manager B. Main National project partners C. ILO Field Office Director (for ILO only) D. Field Technical Specialist E. Donor
Terms of Reference
Contents of the Terms of Reference of the Evaluation:
A. Introduction and rationale for evaluation B. Brief background on project and context C. Purpose, scope and clients of evaluation D. Suggested analytical framework E. Main outputs F. Methodology to be followed G. Management arrangements, work plan and timeframe
Once the TOR is approved by the Project Management, the evaluation manager can then undergo the proper evaluation phase as stipulated in the TOR.
The evaluation manager is assured of efficient use of resources: 1. Gathering relevant information prior and during the evaluation 2. Ensuring the efficient use of time 3. Arranging for the evaluator to meet the right people 4. Scheduling interviews and meetings with partners, and 5. Ensuring efficient logistical arrangements.
Evaluation Report
The Evaluation Report Contains:
Abstract Brief background on the project and its logic Purpose, scope and clients of evaluation Methodology Review of implementation Presentation of findings regarding project performance Conclusions Recommendations Lessons learned Annexes
Evaluation Report
Example of an Evaluation Report (per World Bank):
Here.
Evaluation Managers
The evaluation manager is responsible for managing all independent and internal evaluations. The evaluation manager should have no links to the project decision-making and hence should not be the technical or administrative backstopper of the project.
Evaluation Managers
Roles:
Determine the target audience for the evaluation and the key evaluation questions theevaluation should answer; Prepare the draft TOR for the evaluation (final approval is given by the evaluation focal person) and send a copy of the approved TOR for information; Identify the evaluation consultant(s), and obtain final approval for their recruitment from the evaluation focal person; Ensure smooth organization of the evaluation process and proper support to the evaluation team;
Evaluation Managers
Roles:
Ensure proper stakeholder involvement in the entire evaluation process; Ensure that gender issues are considered throughout the evaluation process; Manage the process of preparing the evaluation report (including circulating the draft report and collecting comments); Submit the final evaluation report to the evaluation focal person for final review Ensure proper follow-up on the recommendations and dissemination of lessons learned
Evaluators
The evaluator carries out the evaluation and prepares the evaluation report according to theTOR. Roles:
Adhere to internationally-accepted good practices and solid ethical principals; Be skilled in implementing diverse evaluation methodologies; Ensure the evaluation is an inclusive and participatory learning exercise; and Be culturally- and gender-sensitive