Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Efficient working of wastewater treatment plant depends upon the accuracy of design of wastewater treatment plant. Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) and Effluent Treatment Plants (ETPs) essentially work on certain well-established principles. Economics of construction is a major factor in construction of any wastewater treatment facility
COST ANALYSIS
For the design of waste water treatment plant we need to know: Initial construction cost Annual operation cost Maintenance cost
COST ANALYSIS
While preparing a cost estimate consider the following points: Both capital and annual cost be reported All cost estimates be referenced to some cost index (as costs are changing so rapidly & also to allow effective cost comparisons to be made in the future)
Projected future value of index Future cost = --------------------------------------- x Current cost. Current Value of index
The analysis and structural design of all types of tanks is carried out by using SEPL- Tank software. All the tanks are designed using this single software, hence uniformity in the results is also expected. The outputs given by SEPL Tank are then fed into a spreadsheet prepared in Microsoft Excel to work out the quantities.
METHODOLOGY
Selection of Shape and Size
Analyze Circular, Square and Rectangular shaped reactors for their cost.
METHODOLOGY
The rates used for calculation of the cost of a tank can be taken from Schedule of Rates of respective State PWD. The rates taken include the following sub heads: Cost of Materials Cost of Labor Nominal Carriage Contractors profit Over head charges and Contingencies.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
DEVELOPING COST CURVES FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTS For ASP we consider the cost of following equipments: Equalization Basin Settling Tank and Clarifloculator Fixed Aerators/ Floating Aerators Clarifier Pumps
CIVIL STRUCTURES
CIRCULAR TANKS
Geometry of circular tanks to be considered: Diameter of tank Height of tank Wall thickness Length of toe Length of heel Thickness of toe and heel Thickness of base lab
Cost/Lite r
2.00
3.00 4.00
1.70
2.20 2.70
5.34
15.55 33.93
0.10
0.21 0.34
1.90
1.36 1.01
5.00
10.00
3.20
3.20
62.83
251.33
0.52
1.37
0.83
0.55
A graph is then plotted between capacity (in cubic meter) and cost (Rs in lacs) and the equation for best-fit curve is obtained.
COMPONENT
Circular Tanks Square Tanks Rectangular Tanks Aspect Ratio 1.5 Aspect Ratio 2
FUNCTION
C=0.0256 V0.7430 C=0.0320 V0.7776
REGRESSION COEFFICIENT
0.9962 0.9863
0.9864 0.9907
Fixed Aerators
C= 0.3512 H 0.6405
Floating Aerators
Clariflocculator Mechanism Clarifier Mechanism Clarifier Scraper Arm
C= 0.9718 H 0.4597
C= 0.8213 D 0.7394 C= 0.6274 D 0.7749 C= 0.3107 D 0.8098
0.9433
0.9769 0.9547 0.9767
Centrifugal Pumps C= 0.0828 H 0.9794 D= Dia0.9746 C= Cost in Lacs, H= Horse power of equipment, of Clarifier in m
CONCLUSIONS
Circular tank is most economical in construction cost. As Aspect ratio of a Rectangular tank increases its cost also increases.
CONCLUSIONS
Designers should also add local variations like: Land acquisition rates, development of site, additions for piping and interconnecting paths, drains, lighting and laboratory equipments etc.
Energy requirements for construction costs and for maintenance, labor, parts and supply costs are also reported.
THANK YOU