ENERGY CONSERVATION WHY ? WHAT IS THE NEED? WHO WILL GAIN ?

All India Power Shortages $Existing Supply : 368,046 M Units $Existing Demand : 414,000 M Unit $ Shortage : 11.5 %

POWER COST FOR LAST TEN YEARS 3 Fold Increase in Last Nine Years
4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005
4.5 4.16 3.75 3.47 3.15 4.2 4.21 4.22 4.25

UNIT PRICE (Rs/Kwh)

NATIONAL POWER SCENE

$Precarious $Adverse Impact On Industry $New Project Additions very slow $Action Plan Required for Improvement

COMPARISION OF POWER COST

Comparative Power Cost In Different Countries

4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0
4.5

2 1.7 1.25 1

UNIT PRICE (Rs/Kwh)

India

USA

China

Saudi Arabia

Europe

ENERGY SAVING POTENTIAL IN INDIAN INDUSTRY $Energy Saving Potential Rs.100,000.00 Million/yr

$Equivalent 2500 MW
$Investment Opportunity Rs.200,000.00 Million

ENERGY SAVING POTENTIAL In Industry Electrical Devices

Equipment VFD Soft Starter MW Saving 350 80 Savings in Rs. Million 8750 2000

Auto Star Delta

EE Motors Lighting Volt stabilizers Energy Effi Chokes Auto Lux Level Controller On/Off temp Control Total

80
125 80 40 5 80 840

2000
3125 2000 1000 125 2000 21000

Investment Potential Rs.42000 million

ENERGY COST AS % OF MANUFACTURING COST $Chlor Alkali Industry 65% $Cement Industry 40% $Paper Industry 25% $Chemical Industry 15% $Foundry 25% $Engineering Industry 10%

Energy Conservation : An Excellent opportunity for enhancing profit and improving competitiveness

PROBLEMS FACED Lack of Awareness Doubting High Capital Investment Lack Of Attractive Financing Schemes Over Promises Reliability Of Equipment Pricing of Energy need for Policy Changes

POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS

Awareness Campaign Encon Mission Training to Industry Energy Summit Energy Norms Demo Projects Award Schemes

ENERGY CONSERVATION AT MACRO LEVEL 3-Pronged Approach a. Capacity Utilization b. Fine Tuning c. Technology Up gradation (Target Reduction in specific energy consumption)

MACRO LEVEL METHODOLOGY Energy Input (a) = Unavoidable losses (c) +Theoretical Requirement (b) +Avoidable losses (d)

MACRO LEVEL METHODOLOGY FOCUS SHOULD BE a. To concentrate on avoidable losses b. Quantify the losses c. Identify ways and means for reduction d. Implementation

ENERGY CONSERVATION IN ELECTRICAL MOTORS A device which converts electrical energy into mechanical energy Major source of energy consumption Major population- Induction motors

Motor Efficiency =O/P Power/Input PowerX100 Watt LossesStator & rotor losses Iron Losses Friction & Windage losses Stray Load losses

Range Of losses In An Induction Motor

Motor Losses #Voltage dependent Iron Losses Magnetization Eddy Current #Current Dependent copper losses Stator Rotor #Mechanical losses Friction and windage losses

Energy Waste- Causes @Use of less efficient motors @Oversized/undersized motors @Improper supply voltage @Voltage fluctuations @Poor power factor @Less efficient driven equipment @Idle running

Motor Efficiency Improvement Motor operation in lightly loaded condition which is common practice in industry Forced to operate in less efficient zone

Voltage Optimisation Impact on motor operating parameters $ Red. in volt. Dependent losses $ Capacity reduces. $ PF Improves $ Load Current drops. $ Load factor improves $ Efficiency improves

Optimisation of Lightly Loaded Motors Options Lightly loaded motors + Delta to permanent star connection +Auto star delta convertor +Soft start cum energy saver +Down Sizing +Overall voltage optimisation

Soft Start Cum Energy Saver % of Loading % Saving 10 60 20 38 30 20 40 11 50 6.5 60 4.5 70 2.5 80 1.5 90 1.0

Optimise The Plant Operating Voltage Overall - Plant operating voltage plays vital role in energy saving -Suggested to have on line voltage optimization (OLTC) -Magnetization losses vary exponentially with the voltage * Capacity prop V2 *Volt. Opt. will vary capacity *Should be implemented after analyzing the loading pattern of all motors

Energy Conservation in Electrical Distribution System * Componenets in electrical distribution a. HT/LT Circuit breakers b. Switches and Fuses c. Transformers d.Busbars/Cables (HT/LT)

Measures in Minimizing Distribution Losses * HT/LT Circuit Breakers Maintain the contact surface uniformity, through vigorous maintenance Select energy efficient fuses

Measures in Minimizing Distribution Losses * Transformers #Select energy efficient #wherever possible run in parallel #Loading should be optimal

Measures in Minimizing Distribution Losses * Bus Ducts /Power Cables # Select correct size # Bus duct with minimum joints and bends # Cables with minimum joints #Panel should be placed near to load wherever possible to minimize cable length & its losses # Cable should be terminated with proper crimping sockets

Methods and Procedures To Minimize The Distribution Losses * Voltage drop measurement # In a large complex distribution system voltage drops are common # Acceptable limit is 4-5 V/PHASE # More than 5V/phase indicates energy loss in system * Reasons For Voltage Drop # Poor Power Factor # Inadequate Cable size laid # Poor contact surface at Cable termination Cable joints contactors/switches

Case Study Voltage Drop From Engineering Industry Voltage at substation 415 V Voltage at LT panel 398 V Load Current 180 to 200A PF - 0.4 LAG Cable size 1RX3CX300 mm. sq
Relocate 90 KVAR Cap bank from SS to LT panel Reduced 50% of energy losses Annual Saving Rs. 0.6 lacs

Energy Conservation in Transformers Transformer Efficiency 98-99% Optimum Efficiency Occurs when Iron Losses = Copper Losses (Optimum eff. Occurs between 40% to 60 % of loading ) Selection of Transformer should be based on TOC TOC = Price +(No load loss x loss value) +(load loss x loss value)

Three Phase Transformer Typical Loss Chart KVA Iron Loss FL Copper Loss 500 1030 6860 750 1420 9500 1000 1770 11820 1250 1820 12000

*loss is in watts

CASE STUDY
11KV

CB
2000KVA 11KV/433V

CB
2000KVA 11KV/433V

CB

CB

415V

CASE STUDY Background *Cap of Xmer = 1600 KVA *Load on Xmer is 80 % *Iron Loss = 2.3 kw *copper loss = 21 kw Suggestion Operate both transformer in parallel *One Xmer operation loss = 2.3+21(0.8)2= 15.7 kw *Both Xmer in operation loss = [2.3+21x(0.4)2]x2=11.3 kw Annual Saving = Rs.0.78 lacs

THANK YOU