Gravimetric Analysis is based on the determination of weight of a substance of known composition that is chemically related to the analyte. 1914 Nobel Prize to T.W.Richards (harvard university) for the atomic weights of Ag, Cl, and N.
Gravimetric Analysis is based on the determination of weight of a substance of known composition that is chemically related to the analyte. 1914 Nobel Prize to T.W.Richards (harvard university) for the atomic weights of Ag, Cl, and N.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Gravimetric Analysis is based on the determination of weight of a substance of known composition that is chemically related to the analyte. 1914 Nobel Prize to T.W.Richards (harvard university) for the atomic weights of Ag, Cl, and N.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Associate Professor of Chemistry Department of Medicinal Chemistry Mashad University of Medical Sciences gravi metric (weighing - measure) Definition: a precipitation or volatilization method based on the determination of weight of a substance of known composition that is chemically related to the analyte
analyte - chemical element or compound of interest Reaction: aA + rR -----> A a R r ppt where: a is # of moles of analyte A r is # of moles of reagent R A a R r is a pure, insoluble precipitate which we can dry and weigh or ignite to convert to something we can weigh ppt=precipitate 1914 Nobel Prize to T.W.Richards (Harvard University) for the atomic weights of Ag, Cl, and N
Richards and his group determined atomic weights of 55 of the 92 known elements using gravimetry T.W.Richards: Every substance must be assumed to be impure, every reaction must be assumed to be incomplete, every method of measurement must be assumed to contain some constant error, until proof to the contrary can be obtained. 7 Steps in Gravimetric Analysis Dry and weigh sample Dissolve sample Add precipitating reagent in excess Coagulate precipitate usually by heating Filtration-separate ppt from mother liquor Wash precipitate (peptization) Dry and weigh to constant weight Precipitation: precipitating agent sample dissolved components Dissolve sample Add ppting reagent Filter Dry Weigh Suction Filtration Filter flask Buchner funnel Filter paper Glass frit Filter adapter Heavy-walled rubber tubing Water aspirator Mother liquor Identify insoluble form
Two considerations: Minimize errors due to limited precipitate solubility Minimize errors due to precipitation process
a. Finite solubility of precipitate
ideally, K sp = 0 (i.e., completely insoluble)
o Some come close: ~10 -38 for Fe(OH) 3
~10 -50 for Ag 2 S
o For AgCl, K sp = 1.78 x 10 -10
For example: what would be the % error introduced in gravimetric analysis by the solubility of AgCl?
For a 0.1000 g AgCl precipitate in 200 ml H 2 O:
Note: Error is independent of mass of precipitate, relative error will decrease as precipitate mass increases (i.e., 0.038% error for 1.000 g AgCl) + - sp + - K =[Ag ][Cl ] S=[Ag ] =[Cl ] -5 sp S= K =1.33x10 M -5 -4 -4 1.33x10 molAgCl 143.32gAgCl 0.200L =3.824x10 gAgCl 1L 1molAgCl 3.824x10 g So, %error: x100 = 0.38% 0.1000g | | | | | | | | | \ . \ . b. Precipitation process
ideally, wed like a precipitate that forms quickly. This implies:
Large, pure crystals Low solubility Easily filtered Easily washed
How does precipitation occur?
1. As K sp is exceeded, solution becomes supersaturated 2. At some point nucleation begins 3. At the same time, crystal growth begins Two points to remember: 1. Crystal growth is independent of degree of supersaturation 2. Nucleation increases with degree of supersaturation
Minimization of supersaturation will produce the largest particles
Two particle size classes
Colloids very small difficult to handle experimentally Crystals large (~ 10 -1 mm) easily and rapidly filtered high purity What affects degree of supersaturation?
K sp
Temperature solubility as T
Reagent addition speed slower addition gives precipitation a chance to begin at lower supersaturation levels
But, even with the above precautions, we will often obtain colloid instead of a crystal! Keys to successful colloid precipitation: 1. Add precipitant slowly and in slight excess 2. Digest precipitate (Heat, stir, sit)
What about crystalline precipitate? Similar to colloids: 1. Dilute solution 2. Slow precipitant addition 3. Elevated temperature 4. Heat unstirred Contaminants can escape from crystal lattice
Increase crystal bridges Particle Size / Filterability produce particles large enough to be 'caught ideally, produce crystals avoid colloidal suspension particle size = 1 - 100 nm Precipitate Formation crystallization nucleation: particles join to produce aggregates crystal growth aggregate grows and 'fall out' of solution
We want a few big chunks of precipitate! supersaturation: more solute than should be present in solution relative supersaturation: a measure of supersaturation, (Q-S)/S Q = actual solute concentration S = equilibrium solute concentration Controlling Precipitation Increase S Increase temperature Decrease Q Dilute solution Well mixed (stirring) What Do We Get Out of Gravimetry? % of analyte, % A
%A = weight of analyte x 100 weight of sample
How Do We Get %A? % A = weight of ppt x gravimetric factor (G.F.) x 100 weight of sample
G.F. = a FW[analyte] b FW[precipitate]
G.F. = # gms of analyte per 1 gm ppt Gravimetric Factor X apples + Y sugar = Z apple pies
What is this relationship in chemistry?
The Gravimetric Factor G.F. = a FW[analyte] b FW[precipitate]
Analyte ppt G.F. CaO CaCO 3
FeS BaSO 4
UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 . 6H 2 O U 3 O 8
Cr 2 O 3 Ag 2 CrO 4
Analyte ppt G.F. CaO CaCO 3 CaO/CaCO 3
FeS BaSO 4 FeS/BaSO 4
UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2
U 3 O 8 3UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 /U 3 O 8
Cr 2 O 3 Ag 2 CrO 4 Cr 2 O 3 /2Ag 2 CrO 4
Problem Consider a 1.0000 g sample containing 75% potassium sulfate (FW 174.25) and 25% MSO 4 . The sample is dissolved and the sulfate is precipated as BaSO 4 (FW 233.39). If the BaSO 4
ppt weighs 1.4900, what is the atomic weight of M 2+ in MSO 4 ? ANS: Mg 2+
Answer The hard part is setting up the correct equation (good stoichiometry skills are essential here!):
Rearranging and solving:
06 . 96 39 . 233 * 25 . 0 25 . 174 39 . 233 * 75 . 0 4900 . 1 + + = x ) ( 12 . 24 ; 06 . 96 3475 . 58 4855 . 0 2 Mg x x + = + = Problem A mixture of mercurous chloride (FW 472.09) and mercurous bromide (FW 560.99) weighs 2.00 g. The mixture is quantitatively reduced to mercury metal (At wt 200.59) which weighs 1.50 g. Calculate the % mercurous chloride and mercurous bromide in the original mixture. ANS: 0.5182 g Answer Again, important to set up correct equation:
Rearranging and solving:
( ) 99 . 560 2 59 . 200 * 2 09 . 472 * 59 . 200 * 2 50 . 1 x x + = ( ) g x x 5182 . 0 50 . 1 2 7151 . 0 8498 . 0 = = + Homogeneous Precipitation
(NH 2 )CO + 3 H 2 O + heat
HCOOH + OH - + CO 2 + 2 NH 4 +
High Electrolyte Concentration to Aid Precipitation Excess charge on colloid creates ionic atmosphere around particle Composition by Gravimetric Analysis Ni 2+ (aq) + H 2 DMG Ni(DMG) 2 + 2 H +
A 0.8234 g org sample produced 0.1397 g of bis(dimethylglyoximate) nickel (II) (FW = 288.91 g/mol). Find the nickel content. Explain how to create a large, filterable precipitate. Combustion Analysis Find the empirical formula for a 13.72 mg organic sample that produced 6.97 mg of water and 28.44 mg of carbon dioxide Gravimetric Overview Simple Cheap Glassware Reagents ovens, etc. Balances Specific Timely (1/2 day) Accurate Precise (0.1-0.3 %) Sensitive