Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We live in a time of great moral confusion. False moral systems are being promoted in every imaginable way. This confusion has allowed evils like contraception, abortion, euthanasia, testtube babies, surrogate motherhood, and embryonic research to become increasingly acceptable.
The Foundations of Moral Reasoning How do we now the moral law? Genesis 1:26-27 Only man is made in the image and likeness of the eternal God who created the universe. We have spiritual souls, intellects and wills. Like God we can know and love. We can receive gods Spirit into our souls. We are capable of one day living in unimaginable glory in the Kingdom of Heaven
Unlike all other creatures in the visible world that are moved by instinct we are truly free. Because we are free we are moral beings: We can choose to do good or evil. Through our intellect we can discover the goodness (morality) of an action This judgment of the intellect is called conscience Through our free will we can choose good or do evil
With this gift comes accountability If we do good and avoid evil we will attain glory in heaven. Romans 2:6-10 In heaven, we will possess the all-good God Himself; we will no longer be able to choose evil.
How do we know what is good and evil? We consult the moral law, which is based on the eternal law of God We conform to Gods nature He is the God of truth, justice, and love. Therefore all actions taken must be done in truth, justice, and love. This is the unchanging essence of the moral law
How do we know the demands of the moral law? The Ten Commandments, Gods gift through public revelation, sum up the requirements of the moral law. The two great commandments are a summary of the Ten Commandments Matthew 22:37-40 We can also know the requirements of the moral law through human reason Romans 1:19-20 Our reason allows us to see the order God has put in the universe Our free will allows us to live according to that order.
Virtually all men agree that certain actions (honesty and faithfulness) are worthy of our rational nature; Other actions (cheating and adultery) are unworthy. This is known as the natural moral law. Reason discerns that man is accountable to a higher law than merely natural law, a law of human nature.
We do not hold animals or inanimate objects responsible for hurting us because they dont know any other way to act. We do blame and hold responsible humans for deliberately hurting us. Humans are rational and capable of acting differently and because they are capable they should act in accordance with their rational nature. Because of original sin, our reason is wounded. This wound adversely effects our understanding of moral law and makes our reason susceptible to error
The Catholic Church, which teaches with the authority of her founder Jesus Christ is the final and infallible interpreter of both the natural moral law and public revelation. Thus, she is a reliable teacher when it comes to life issues.
Objective Morality
Examines the rightness and wrongness of humans acts as they are in themselves
Subjective Morality
Examines the personal guilt or merit an individual has for their moral acts.
How do we evaluate moral acts? Morality considers the rightness and wrongness of human actions. Only human actions don freely and knowingly can be evaluated. Three elements determine the morality of human acts: 1. The object of the act ( what the act is objectively) 2. The intention or purpose of the act (why the act is chosen subjectively) 3. The circumstances surrounding the act For an act to be morally good, all three of these elements must be good.
How do we evaluate moral acts? The ends (good intentions) dont justify the means (objectively bad acts). Evil intentions corrupt otherwise good actions. Circumstances cannot change intrinsically evil acts into good ones.
Circumstances can increase or decrease the moral quality of an act Circumstances can make a normally good act bad Circumstances can change some normally bad actions into good ones
Moral Principles Approved by the Catholic Church Catechism of the Catholic Faith Part III Life In Christ (1691-2557)
Moral Principles
Do good; Avoid evil (Ps 37:27)
This is the basic precept of the natural law and the foundation of morality
Moral Principles
The principle of the double effect An act that is good, but that has an evil side effect, may only be done under the following conditions:
1. 2. 3. 4. The act itself must be good or at least morally neutral The evil effect must not be directly willed, but only foreseen and tolerated The good effect must not be the result of the evil effect The good desired must equal or outweigh the evil permitted
Material cooperation with evil Formal Cooperation is assisting anothers wrong-doing while approving it. This is always wrong. Material Cooperation is assisting anothers wrong-doing without approving of it. This is allowed following the same principles as double effect.
Moral Principles
The principle of totality The Vatican document, Charter for Health Care Workers, section 66: For the sake of our overall health, we can mutilate, modify or remove an organ or body part. Therapeutic sterilization is covered under this principle whereas contraceptive sterilization is not. Choosing the lesser of two evils If we are unintentionally faced with two or more unavoidable evils, we must choose the lesser one. Minimizing a greater evil
We must work to limit the harm caused by an unavoidable evil. We may if unavoidable support a lesser evil to minimize a greater one.
Values Clarification
This morality teaching method presents students with various predicaments that call for moral choices. It then presents several moral systems including Christian morality as if all the systems were equally acceptable. Each student is asked to reflect on the situation and choose whichever system they believe is best. This sets the student up as the ultimate authority on what is right and wrong
Cultural Cliches
Look out for number one You only live once. Follow your heart But I love him/her If it feels good it We cant impose our morality. We must be tolerant. God wouldnt want me to be unhappy.
Any system which promotes man, not God, as the decision maker between right and wrong is in error.