Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outlines
Introduction Gas Well Test Evaluation Sheet Shallow Low-Pressure and Highly Productive Gas Reservoir. Stimulation Efforts Evaluation , Summery and recommendation. References
Introduction
This Presentation shows various field case studies in low, high permeability, and fractured carbonate gas wells including summary, conclusions, and recommendations. It also includes a gas well test evaluation sheet and various cross plotting techniques before and after workovers.
Interpreted Data
MBH correction: tp (hr) tpDA (dimensionless time) Buildup slope m(mmpsia2/cP) (Pwfo) (mmpsia2/cP) (Pwf) t=1 (mmpsia2/cP)
Calculated Data
Pressure Data
The absolute open flow is 45.538 mmscfd. A Cartesian plot of p2/qsc versus qsc (Figure 1) gives a straight line (except for a small deviation and the low rate point).
If the rate needs to be written in terms of flowing pressure, the quadratic equation can be solved as follows:
Conclusion
The low n value and the high B value indicate large rate-dependent skin. The slope B in Figure 1 indicates the significance of the high-velocity effect on the productivity of the well. A large slope implies large rate-dependent skin. The intercept A is related to steady-state skin factor.
The reservoir is 12,950 ft deep and consists of layers of clay and sandstone. The overall thickness is about 52 ft with average porosity of about 14 to 20%. The empirical deliverability equations are
Kh is small (339.23 mD) , A qsc becomes large, and the B qsc term can become negligible (not necessarily zero) when compared to the laminar pressure drop term. We could then write