Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
Indian Small Car Segment Management Decision Problem Marketing Research Problem Research Design Data Analysis Conclusion The way forward
25-05-2012
Diesel Penetration Negatively impacted by production disruptions at Maruti Suzuki, the market leader in the segment Competitive pressures intensifying on the back of new launches Small Car Segment grew by 2% by Dec-11 (FY12) w.r.t. 6.5% growth rate in 2011
25-05-2012 Small Car Industry 3
25-05-2012
Brand Ambassador Social Status Changing Lifestyle Reference Occasions Family Need
Inflation Per Capita Disposable Income Global Crude Oil Prices Interest Rates Government Interventions Investments
25-05-2012
Model
Behavioural Intention = bi ei + NBj MCj
where, i = salient outcomes bi = how strongly do you believe that these outcomes will creep in ei = evaluation of the outcomes
j = relevant others NBj = opinion of relevant others MCj = motivation to comply others opinions
Beliefs Attitude Purchase Experience/Evaluation Repeat Purchase Loyalty
Affect
25-05-2012
Proposed Hypothesis
Hyp1: Price sensitiveness is high in consumer buying behavior in this segment. Hyp2: Financing options play an important part in buying behavior. Hyp3: Distribution has a substantial contribution in generating sales.
Hyp4: Post Sales Service has a substantial contribution in generating sales.
Hyp4: Communication channels play a vital role in generating awareness of a new car in the
segment.
Hyp5: It is the brand which influences the sale. Hyp6: Inflation has significant impact on buying behavior. Hyp7: Interest rates has significant impact on buying behaviour.
Hyp8: PCDI has significant impact on buying behaviour.
25-05-2012 Small Car Industry 7
Research Design
Exploratory Research Design
o Secondary Data: qualitative analysis o Experience Surveys
25-05-2012
25-05-2012
Sample Size:
o 158 for Primary Research
25-05-2012
10
Data Analysis
25-05-2012
11
Demographics-Sample
Age Group
Occupation
Annual Income
25-05-2012
12
25-05-2012
13
Express your opinion regarding importance of the following factors in purchasing a car
Hypothesis: Each factor has equal effect on buying a car
H0: = 0 vs. H1: 0 t Calculated = 5.24 t Critical = 2.263 Level of significance = .05 H0 is rejected. Infrence: Each factor has diffrent impact on purchasing a car.
25-05-2012
15
How strongly do you believe that the following attributes should be present in your chosen/present car?
Hypothesis: Choosing a car will be independent of the attributes (Product
specific) H0: = 0 vs. H1: 0 t Calculated = -9.85 t Critical = -2.263 Level of significance = .05 H0 is rejected. Infrence: Choosing a car will be very much dependent on the attributes
25-05-2012
16
How strongly do you believe that the following factors have contributed/shall contribute to your purchasing of car?
Hypothesis: Choosing a car will be independent of the attributes (External
Parameters) H0: = 0 vs. H1: 0 t Calculated = -16.89 t Critical = -2.263 Level of significance = .05 H0 is rejected. Infrence: Choosing a car will be very much dependent on the external parameters.
25-05-2012
17
Tick the factors which you think shall influence your buying decision of a car
Hypothesis: Every factor has equal influence on the purchase of a car H0: = 0 vs. H1: 0
t Calculated = 12.654 t Critical = 2.247 Level of significance = .05 H0 is rejected.
Cross Tabulation
H01: There is no significant difference in the impact of individual factors on all age group
of customers while purchasing a car similar buying behavior of cars
H02: Keeping the factors constant, customers falling under different age groups have
F calculated (rows): 28.43 > F critical: 2.89 i.e. H02 rejected F calculated (columns): 1.26 < F critical: 2.09 i.e. H01 accepted Level of significance: .05 Inference: The deciding factors stated doesnt have significant difference on the different age group of customers, where as small cars are more preferred by individuals within age group of 21 yrs. to 30 yrs., compared to others. ANOVA TABLE
Source of Variation Age Group Parameters Error Total
25-05-2012
df 3 11 33 47
19
Cross Tabulation
H01: There is no significant difference in the impact of individual factors on all income
groups while purchasing a car
H02: Keeping the factors constant, customers falling under different income groups have
similar buying behavior of cars F calculated (rows): 8.309 > F critical: 2.89 F calculated (columns): 12.14 > F critical: 2.09 Level of significance: .05 Inference: The deciding factors stated have significant difference on the customers of different income groups and there is also a significant difference between the different income groups so far as purchasing cars are concerned.
Source of Variation Rows Columns Error Total
25-05-2012
20
25-05-2012
21
Recommendations..(1/2)
Comfortable Safety Quotient Fuel Efficiency Style Spacious
Penetration Pricing Value for Money
Product
Price
Place
Distributors and Dealers Service Centre Availability
25-05-2012
Promotion
Advertisements Print Media Internet Marketing Branding
22
Recommendations..(2/2)
Potential Markets: Urban & Semi Urban Hot Cake: Working Professionals within age group 21-30 yrs.
25-05-2012
23
Thank You
25-05-2012
24